View Single Post
Old 12-04-2012, 15:04   #8
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sky Movies snaps up James Bond films for TV, on-deman

Quote:
Originally Posted by Telly Bear View Post
You are aware that the Murdochs do not own Sky? What you're trying to say is like blaming Virginmedia because Virgin has been found selling personal flight details of celebs and removing funding from an Air Ambulance.

Yes Virginmedia is connect to Richard Branson as a share holder, yes Murdoch has Shares in Sky but that's where it ends. Sky would still be doing everything they are doing if Murdoch was not a share holder.

I still have VM even though my wife is disgusted with them because of the removal of Air ambulance funding.
Don't spoil his illusion

---------- Post added at 15:04 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone View Post
Yes Sky's bottomless pockets coming to the fore again.
God forbid , a TV platform spending money on OD content for its OD service
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote