View Single Post
Old 24-12-2011, 15:46   #807
craigj2k12
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,226
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
Each 10k can hold 8 cable line cards, one line card that comes to mind can have 72 downstreams and 60 upstreams, split that 12 ways you've 12 service groups of 6 downstreams and 5 upstreams.

Basically fully load a Cisco 10k with that you've close to 24Gbps of downstream and, using the current schemes VM are, 8.7Gbps of upstream capacity.
So what are VM using, if they have this many upstream channels available why do they all seem so congested? Most areas are using 4 downstreams and 1 upstream, and if theres 72 down and 60 up, why cant it be 4 down and 3 up for each modem, that would certainly lower ping and jitter and stop TBB ping graphs looking like a house fire.

Im sure theres a reason why not, but I cant work it out myself
craigj2k12 is offline   Reply With Quote