Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Hey guys just wondering if anyone else in the Uddingston area has their 2 upstream and 8 downstream channels? I noticed a few days ago and then looked on the double speed page but still sitting at November for the 120 upgrade. Anyone in this area had any luck getting an early extra boost?
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Think you might be the first, I'm in ML2 and I just got 6DS the other week and I'm still on 1US.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Seems strange they would have Coatbridge updated and still have people just down the road on the same UBR not done, is that standard? It defo seems done on mine. I had 8 downstream channels for a while now too, at least 2 months if not more.
Upstream US-1 US-2 US-3 US-4 Channel Type 2.0 N/A N/A 2.0 Channel ID 2 N/A N/A 1 Frequency (Hz) 27400000 N/A N/A 35800000 Ranging Status Success Other Other Success Modulation 16QAM N/A N/A 16QAM Symbol Rate (Sym/sec) 5120000 N/A N/A 5120000 Mini-Slot Size 4 N/A N/A 4 Power Level (dBmV) 43.75 N/A N/A 43.75 T1 Timeouts 0 0 0 0 T2 Timeouts 0 0 0 0 T3 Timeouts 0 0 0 0 T4 Timeouts 0 0 0 0 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Not long now :)
---------- Post added at 00:15 ---------- Previous post was at 00:03 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
Host cpc3-uddi24-2-0-cust328.20-3.cable.virginmedia.com |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
thank you :) Do you have a Broadband Quality Monitor http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/monitors.html |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] I have set up a new one and I will post it tomorrow. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
Still just on 1 Upstream https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/07/41.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
This is my latest chart:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...08-07-2013.png I think part of the early am - 1am ish spike will be sickbeard kicking in. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Well ML2 has now followed ML5 and I'm now on 2 US.
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] Code:
Upstream US-1 US-2 US-3 US-4 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Still on one :(
---------- Post added at 12:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ---------- Quote:
Can you post the host info from the link http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/mi...?do=connection Ty |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Sure thing:
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
thank you :)
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Well ML3 has 2 US. BUT
Look at it :( https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/07/41.png Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
My graph is really nice and smooth a little bit better than when it was on 1US
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...11-07-2013.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
The speed is very good the ping is 19ms -23ms but my graph is really up & down :(
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/07/40.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/07/39.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
What happened at about 13:30? Your minimum latency jumped up slightly after that brief spell of packet loss.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
Look like a bug in my SH2 Firmware causing the minimum latency gone up Attachment 24759 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Looking at all the data for the last 3 days Upstream Channel Bonding has made my connection slower
Attachment 24766 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
they must have bonded a low usage channel with a congested one, shame they arent actually adding any capacity
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Virgin doing more work :)
Attachment 24771 Now on 2 new Upstreams - Still look like am on a congested Upstream :( Attachment 24770 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Noticed I have been moved to the same.
Quote:
Graph is still nice and smooth looking I noticed a bit of packetloss the other day so that was probably when they swapped my channels. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2013/07/9.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Hmm not sure I guess I could be STMed...as its been getting worse and was getting some stuff and was streaming the Moto GP qualifying.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
Not looking to good today :/ |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
This is mine https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2013/07/8.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Been using the connection again today :) you can see when I stopped and its going back to normal graph.
Might add most of the bad stuff is due to the STM kicking in and me still using the line :P |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Wonder if its coincidence but FTTC has a live date of September too in my area....tbh im more looking forward to my upload to get to 12 than download to 120 as that extra 20mbit down really not gonna make much difference to me as im usually wireless or using powerline adapters.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
read this and checked mine, last few months been Sept-november for upgrade, now September. finally getting somewhere. as a good few towns & cities have this for ages now.
thanks for info :) |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
The upstream is what I'm looking forward too as well but not gonna lie every small increase in STM allowance with this crazy new system, il take it!! |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Sounds like your area having some issues then, for what is worth my area is fine so its not affecting the whole Uddingston UBR catch area.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
Have u gotten better results? http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...17-08-2013.png https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/21.png Maybe a bias test being on VirginMedia server. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/22.png Independent test to make sure. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/23.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Weegrim could you try and do a speedtest on the Preston site? Just curious to see if its as good for you when it comes to latency.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/20.png I like this wee Uddingston sub group we have going here :) |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Similar ping to what I get seems Preston is a good site to test to must be good routing to there.
Will be interesting to see if our ping goes down once they open the Edinbugh LINX peering should be good not to have to go through England all the time... This is my test to Preston on wireless. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/19.png |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
My tests there were done via Ethernet, the only wireless devices I have are iPhones, iPads ect.
That will be interesting to see. Any clue when that's meant to happen? |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
I'm not sure, I should be able to find out as it will be hosted in one of the datacenters that the company I work for have.
Don't think its that far away to be honest which is good. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
How did you find out about it. ?
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
As I said I work for the company where it will go through.
If you google for Internet exchange Scotland you can find a bit more information about it. Here is a pretty good read on it http://blogs.scotland.gov.uk/digital...-for-scotland/ |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
So if i have got this right LINX will instill it's equipment in a up & running data center at your work Jumping. So lets say IXScotland goes live September will virgin move straight onto it or will they wait for a couple of months.
Sorry if this is a stupid question :dunce: |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
I know Virgin is already involved with it as most big internet companies are. So im hoping Virgin will have their routing setup for it as soon as it goes live....but we are talking about Virgin here :dozey:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
---------- Post added at 16:47 ---------- Previous post was at 16:46 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:02 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:07 ---------- Previous post was at 22:02 ---------- Quote:
Chances are if they build a new one, it'll be right next to the old one, which also happens to be right next VM's biggest datacentre in Scotland anyway. I doubt they'll take much time to "move straight onto it" when they're already sat next door. Then again everything VM does around here is either slow or to save money, and this doesn't save them much money so go figure... ---------- Post added at 22:09 ---------- Previous post was at 22:07 ---------- Quote:
Indeed, VM has had interconnects in Scotland with all the major providers for years and yet uses none of them for consumer broadband. ---------- Post added at 22:12 ---------- Previous post was at 22:09 ---------- Quote:
For all other traffic, it is of benefit to VM to keep it on their own network as far as possible, which means taking it down to London or Amsterdam internally and routing it out from there. Even at the biggest Scottish universities - the biggest non-ISP data carriers around, with thousands of internal servers and a captive audience - you'd be surprised how little traffic actually goes or stays anywhere near Scotland. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Bought a new router chepo Tenda N60 to be able to get some 5Ghz seems to work pretty well with my new wireless card that can do 2.4Ghz & 5Ghz.
Unfortunately I seem to been moved to different upstream channels during the tinkering and my IP changed from 80. something to 213.x.x.x need to try and force myself back to upstream channel 1 & 2 instead of 4&5 as the new graph isn't as good and smooth. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
It might not help with the upstreams, but you may be able to get your old IP back by changing the MAC address on the Tenda to the MAC address your old router was using.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Seems its pretty good on the different US and the new IP... :D
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/11.png Now just need them to get this 120mbit upgrade finished! |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
At least you already have 10mbit upload, thats what im mostly wanting the extra 20mbit down doesn't really matter to me.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Hmm that Tenda N-60 wasn't behaving only got 20mbit wired speed so its gone back in the box, have ordered an Asus rt-n56u hopefully I can get my money back for the Tenda.
This is the graph with the old router back on the old 80.x.x.x IP http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...25-08-2013.png Very smooth looking grap the spikes from yesterday was when I was using the line. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
My new Asus RT-N56U just arrived got it configured and its speedy all the time both wireless and wired! Happy days, quite funny I get more speed wireless as Dell only put a 100mbit nic in.
Got a different IP again with the new router https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2013/08/7.png Still seems the SHUB is stuck on using channel 4 & 5 on US instead of the 1 & 2 I got moved on to previously. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2013/08/8.png Happy with this router and for me didn't need to get the n66 as don't have the need for it and next upgrade will be to 802.11ac. Forgot just need the 120mbit to be rolled out now hopefully the September date is true unfortunately it will probably be neared the end than the start of the month. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Glad it's working out for you, it's an awesome router! You can probably get your old IP back by changing the MAC address to match the old one but if you're happy enough then don't bother.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Glad you have it up and running with good results. Iv been on UP channels 2 & 3 for a while now and have had good results. Can't say Iv ever been on channels 4 or 5 that I ever noticed.
Thats also a very sleek bit of kit you bought. Same for myself, the next upgrade will be to .ac but I cannot see that for a while yet, like you say we will be held to the 30th Sep before the uplift here - most likely, and if the rumoured 200Mb/s is next current hardware will be more than sufficient can't personally see VM going near the 1 Gigabit mark for a good while yet! :-p |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
I thought Hamilton had the FTTC rollout completed ages ago. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
What site are you using for that?
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Well the BT checker has March 2014 for FTTC and these stats
Code:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
There has defo been a shake up with the schedule there. I checked those sites not 2 months ago and they all had Coatbridge down for 2015 at one point with some 2014 reports. Now they are saying end of 2013, that's some coincidence.
I can't say I'm really of the mind to switch from VM because my connection (touch wood) has been solid and I can't really say iv been let down by it apart from STM. I get a really good deal with VM just now and to sacrifice that for a reduction in speed just to bypass STM would be a waste of money in the long run when u really look Into it I think. What I am hoping is that this is the wake up call VM has been needing and if they see this competition building more and more we might just see some better treatment this side of the grass. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Yeah both my dates for Virgin 120mbit and the FTTC moved from end of the year till September.
Always good with competition imho! Considering going back to sky as feel Virgin is a bit expensive especially on the call front. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
What I'm enjoying from this is the healthy competition, much overdue that could come from it. I may be totally wrong, but I have a funny feeling that something is gonna be pulled out the bag from VM by the end of the year start of next. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Yeah Im thinking once FTTC is actually live its time to see what retentions can offer, currently got the virgin in the missus name so could try and get a new customer deal option too.
Call costs are really bad tho especially as I phone abroad quite often and man its bad costs. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
The roll-out of Fibre (FTTC) in lots of areas of Scotland was brought forward earlier this year. I believe the Scottish (SNP) government bunged them a wad of money to do this, for example East Kilbride where I live switched from Labour to SNP at the last Scottish parliament election. Suspicious? |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Loaded Padawan's alternative firmware on the Asus RT-N56U bad boy and it seems to be slightly faster than Asus latests firmware
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2013/08/2.png Happy days indeed! Now come on Virgin give me 133/12 pretty please. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Anyone else in Uddingston not being hit with STM i done 10Gb just before 6pm and i did not get STM
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
Also did read on the forum from one of the mods that said STM removal was not being piloted in any areas - hope that is just to throw people off the scent. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I hope not as I seem to have quite a few of them and my connection seems to be running great! |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
1 Attachment(s)
After a fresh restart I get this:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Look what i just got. I just phoned thinking of leaving us people and he put me on it :)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/09/29.png Attachment 24888 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
called up, got a big no no. piratically told me i was lying to him as know one in our area is on 120 mb yet. so looks like need to w8 till october. not going the leaving part, as have just got deal with wife working there now. gotta h8 virgin the way they run these upgrades, SAME CROWD always last:mad::mad: |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Ohh well think might have to get a call in - partner is not happy with the Virgin bills so think a threat about leaving might be in place to get lower bills and upgraded to 120mbit.
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
That what i done to get it. :)
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
So been on 120 for about 2 days now and its working ok
Attachment 24890 Attachment 24889 Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200] (c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:\Users\Martin>tracert www.bbc.co.uk Tracing route to www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.246.90] over a maximum of 30 hops: One thing i have noticed is that the sh2 will not respond to a Traceroute it just sends a Request timed out 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms router.asus.com [192.168.1.1] 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 81 ms 8 ms 9 ms uddi-geam-1b-ge923.network.virginmedia.net [62.2 52.47.245] 4 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms uddi-core-1b-ae1-0.network.virginmedia.net [80.3 .16.141] 5 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms uddi-core-1a-ge-100-0.network.virginmedia.net [8 0.3.16.65] 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms leed-bb-1a-as10-0.network.virginmedia.net [213.1 05.159.70] 7 15 ms 14 ms 13 ms leed-bb-1b-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253 .187.186] 8 19 ms 18 ms 17 ms nrth-bb-1b-et-400-0.network.virginmedia.net [62. 253.175.46] 9 19 ms 18 ms 18 ms tele-ic-4-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253. 174.18] 10 20 ms 20 ms 18 ms pos6-1.rt0.thdo.bbc.co.uk [212.58.239.237] 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms ae0.er01.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [132.185.254.93] 13 21 ms 20 ms 21 ms 132.185.255.164 14 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms bbc-vip011.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [212.58.246.90] Trace complete. C:\Users\Martin> |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
I was reading a story that when IXScotland goes live and providers like vm/bt/ join it. It would help bring the ping time down in scotland. is this a lot of lies or will this happen http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2013/02/scotland-planning-to-build-its-own-internet-exchange-for-isps.html John Souter, CEO of LINX, said (Scotsman): “The biggest difference users will see is in terms of what is called “latency” – the time lapse which can cause gaps – like a pause in conversation. The less distance information has to travel the less problem there is with latency. This is very important to games players, where low latency is critical, as well as Skype and other voice services and anything where there are transactions such as banking services.” |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
It will have direct peering with other countries, I think New York and Holland probably some more.
I wasn't aware of any other IX in Scotland, and I said Edinburgh Linx cause the Linx people are highly involved but then again mr grumpy was extra grumpy that day :D The key thing though is that they configure the traffic to go through it and it should help with latency for Scotland. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Was just having conversation with one of virgin network people he has been working on the cabinet outside our house for 2 days. he said he was doing Noise control for a upgrade on the Upstream from 16 to 64 ?. So does this just let them have more Upstream ??
To be honest i had no idea what he was saying all a bit too technical for me LOL :) Had 3 outages yesterday http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...10-09-2013.png Still looks the same Attachment 24901 |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
QAM16 to QAM64, I believe seph has talked about this a few times. At a basic level, it gives each channel more bandwidth to play with but the side effect is that it's more prone to noise (hence the noise control). It's a good thing!
|
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
Quote:
The outages may well be the work he's already doing (or a colleague) upstream. You appear to already have the new channel plan with 4 possible upstream 6.4MHz RF with 200khz guard bands (24.4, 31.0 , 36.6, 43.2) in space of 3 typical existing centre frequencies (27.4, 35.8, 45.8, ) previously. Theoretically I think you could get 6 x 6.4MHz x QAM64 channels from 17.8MHz thru 59.8MHz based on those centre frequencies just before replacing legacy 5-55MHz DOCSIS Bidi amps to accommodate the (euro)DOCSIS3.0 (5-85MHz) upstream spec and expanding upstream capacity further. However VM may be trying to defer replacement amps in order to accommodate wide bandwidth DOCSIS3.1 amps for OFDM with bottom,mid and top band splits. Replacing all UK (or large proportion of legacy Gerold) equipment is not something you leap into without significant planning and you certainly don't want to do it twice in as many years (usually only within 2 decades or more if you can stretch it)! ;) These things can therefore take significant time….(DOCSIS3.1) OFDM is still probably a a couple of years away yet from practical commercial quantities at least? :( I also suspect VM will want to leapfrog from current 8x4 DOCSIS tuner to 24x8 channels and by-pass Puma6 and Broadcom equivalents before trialling a SuperHub 4 version. Interesting times….. |
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
I sure as don't have friends at Virgin Media, still not letting me upgrade! :td:
Tried the whole "ohh could you try sending the file to the modem for me?" and got shot down apparently there is no option on the system for him to do that! Ahh well looks like end of October (or what ever they extend it to after that passes) for me! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.