KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
Quote:
Another Link |
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
I'd suggest anyone who advocates killing babies "is not a real person". :mad:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
It is a bit fecked up.......
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
It is yet another attempt at back seat anti abortion horror. :dozey:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
I think before everyone's heads explode in a rash of disgust it should be pointed out that the article is not meant to be an argument in favour of infanticide .It is a philosophical argument designed to promote debate about abortion of disabled fetuses which is legal in some cases.She appears to be suggesting in the hyperthetical argument that there is is cause in some cases to kill a badly deformed or otherwise disabled child after birth as in some countries it would be permitted to abort the same fetus before birth
Quote:
The full article is here |
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
By your definition there are rather a lot of not-people out there... |
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Even the devil wouldn't want these people. Hell has is own place for people who kill babies.
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Is this the level of academia we have gotten too in this country where we ponder the killing of babies. Maybe i am not high brow enough but this is just tasteless and crass for so called intellectuals to be hypothesising on at a time when have so many other things to deal with. Thats putting aside the fact that while she might nnt regard it as anything more then an intellectual exercise there are people and groups who believe this type of thing and wil take this as intellectual endorsement. It is just not something any person i know would ever think about in anyway and anyone who can think like this in anyway is not someone i could be round.
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
|
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
The reason the argument is so uncomfortable for pro-choicers is that it exposes the arbitrary nature of our current law to cold, hard logic. There is no cold, hard, dispassionate reason why a severely disabled baby can be killed in the womb but not immediately post-birth. The reason for not killing such a child after birth is not scientific but moral. And if we accept the basis of the debate is a moral one, rather than hiding behind supposedly scientific arguments about "viability", what is that morality to be based on? Where should we draw the line, and why? |
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.