Re: The people vs PFI.
 

I think you'll find it is true, unless he's on chicken feed like mayor Bozo

Re: The people vs PFI.
 

Article on association of MPs to Companies Involved in Private Healthcare: http://socialinvestigations.blogspot...companies.html

If true, worrying ..

Re: The people vs PFI.
 

Figures give you facts, not assumptions.

Lansdowne managed £13 billion of assets on behalf of its clients last year, of which Royal Mail was £50 million, or roughly 0.65% of managed funds - if Peter Davies earned "millions" from the Royal Mail sale (let's say £2 million), if we divide two million by 65 and multiply it by 100, to equal 1% of the Lansdowne managed assets (and the assumption he is paid equally for all of these things), and we then multiply that by 100 to compare it to the £13 billion of managed assets, that means he earned roughly £308 million last year.

Really? ;)

I have no doubt that Peter Davies earned millions, if not tens of millions last year, as he is a Managing Partner in one of the biggest Hedge Funds in the world - but to state as fact that at least two million of that was from less than one percent of investments Lansdowne manage is a gross misinterpretation.

Re: The people vs PFI.
 

Facts and figures can be grossly misinterpreted to, fact is his company made millions from the sale of a public asset that they were given preferential treatment with and he was paid millions to do it is undeniable, we can throw figures around all night but that is the simple straight forward fact, you can dress it up however you please or try and make it less sinister