Originally Posted by dazzer89 (Post 35206618)

Lets hope the Tory slime ball has got arrested to.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35206737)

Which specific Tory slime ball?

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35206737)

Which specific Tory slime ball?

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35209008)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13014161



I cannot remember the Murdoch empire ever saying sorry.

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35209521)

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268185)

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268186)

If this is correct the people that have done this want to be done for aiding and abetting, As they seemed to have helped the killer in regards to this. This is just my opinion?

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268190)

No evidence they helped the killer as I am guessing he didn't phone her. Just more evidence of the insensitive and callous nature of some of our press. You would think the journalists involved would feel bad about it but I am really beginning to wonder about these people....Used to think it was simply the editors enforcing a line but now I think the journalists really think this behaviour is ok.

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35268201)

Remind me again why its a good thing to allow Murdock owner of the News of the screws even more access to the media via Sky ?????

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35268201)

Remind me again why its a good thing to allow Murdock owner of the News of the screws even more access to the media via Sky ?????

Originally Posted by cookie_365 (Post 35268209)

And the fact that Rebekah Brooks, who was editor at the time, happens to be a very good friend of a Mr D Cameron is pure coincidence :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by cookie_365 (Post 35268209)

And the fact that Rebekah Brooks, who was editor at the time, happens to be a very good friend of a Mr D Cameron is pure coincidence :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35268231)

What totally and completely amoral swine...

If it wasn't for the small band of decent hardworking proper investigative journalists I'd be calling for them all to be hung drawn and quartered..

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35268252)

Don't worry i feel the government need to get a grip of this very soon. They should never have allowed the Murdock's to buy all the shares for sky. Murdock will soon have total dominance of the UK news media :(

---------- Post added at 19:53 ---------- Previous post was at 19:52 ----------



Just do it

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268190)

No evidence they helped the killer as I am guessing he didn't phone her. Just more evidence of the insensitive and callous nature of some of our press. You would think the journalists involved would feel bad about it but I am really beginning to wonder about these people....Used to think it was simply the editors enforcing a line but now I think the journalists really think this behaviour is ok.

Originally Posted by Uncle Peter (Post 35268358)

I wonder why all of this has recently started to come out... someone with friends in Millbank perhaps who are on a mission to discredit Murdoch's tools of manipulation? (I hope so).

Freedom of the press is one of the cornerstones of our society but it is unfortunately a value which is inherently flawed in it's openness to abuse by this type of ****. I hope this really is the beginning of the end for the notw and the dismantling of Murdoch's empire. Let the dirt be dished.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35268532)

I've been listening to this unfolding on the radio during this morning and I'm absolutely gobsmacked.

I am waiting with interest to hear how Rebekah Brooks (nee Wade) articulates her inevitable defence of "Yes, I was the editor, but no, I didn't know how we were getting that information about Milly and I didn't ask."

If Rupert Murdoch allows her to continue leading News International's internal investigation in the light of these new allegations, well ... there simply aren't words.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35268637)

Sickening it is. However as a nation we need to take a long, hard look in the mirror. Our national newspapers are commercial operations that stand or fall on their circulation figures. They run the stories they do, because those stories sell papers.

It is no longer good enough for us to say we didn't know how the journalists got their information. We now know exactly the sort of measures that are employed. The question now is, will we as a nation stop supporting these rags with our pocket change?

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268741)

Anyone who is interested in this and is near a TV, watch Channel 4 news NOW.

---------- Post added at 19:03 ---------- Previous post was at 18:59 ----------

News of the World campaigned with Sara Payne for Sarah's Law, guess what they were doing while that was happening? Yup. Hacking her phone.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268741)

[/COLOR]News of the World campaigned with Sara Payne for Sarah's Law, guess what they were alleged to have been doing while that was happening? Yup. Hacking her phone.

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35268765)

I think that a bulk order for paper shredders is about to placed by News International ,the News of The World and the MET in an attempt to stop themselves getting nailed to the wall ,the only person who will come out of this smelling of roses is Rupert Murdoch

I also think that Chris is right,the only way to stop this sort of behaviour is for the readers of these rags to stop buying them because the PCC is a waste of time

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35268765)

I think that a bulk order for paper shredders is about to placed by News International ,the News of The World and the MET in an attempt to stop themselves getting nailed to the wall ,the only person who will come out of this smelling of roses is Rupert Murdoch

I also think that Chris is right,the only way to stop this sort of behaviour is for the readers of these rags to stop buying them because the PCC is a waste of time

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35268772)

I haven't bought the NOW for over 30 years.Same for the Sun,the Mail.I only buy the Telegraph these days and that's for the OH because he likes doing the crossword and other puzzles.

Originally Posted by AdamD (Post 35268788)

Interesting how companies who pay for ads in these papers are only NOW considering removing them.

*shakes head*

Tabloids, it's a shame they aren't banned, perhaps the average IQ in this country would rise if they did. :P

It amazes me how newspapers are able to repeatedly get away with violating people's privacy, yet all they seem to get is a slap on the wrist and a fine.

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35268791)

Yes l agree with you as the masses have been brainwashed for years by the redtops.

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268827)

Oh typical blame the Gingers.

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35268828)

Well who do you blame Devil.:erm:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268852)

Den did you read what I quoted and then posted?

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35268856)

But when it may have hampered a missing child case then people should go to prison.

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35268856)

But when it may have hampered a missing child case then people should go to prison.

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35268861)

Sorry.;)

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268870)

Yes the ones at the top as they had the control and should have questioned where the information was coming from.



Your OK Den:)

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35268856)

I frankly don't give a flying fig that a celebs phone has been hack, and may have exposed things they shouldn't have done.

But when it may have hampered a missing child case then people should go to prison.

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35268882)

Havn't followed this that closely but have caught the highlights on the news and it made me sick to the stomach. Also have seen the police investigating the phone hacking case have gone and spoken to the parents of the soham victims if they find any hacking or anything in that case then the book should be picked up and thrown as hard as law will allow.

I really do hope that this will finally open the eye's of many to what a disreputable scumbag filled organisation news international is. They seem to seek only to have us all at each others throats and be out to cause as much pain and harm as they can truly despicable bunch of people.

I cannot see how they can continue to carry on without at least a sacrificial lamb thrown to the wolves but i doubt we will ever see the real decision makers who authorised this taking the responsibility or getting what they deserve. People of the UK wake up smell them for what they are and never give them another penny of your money.

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35268882)

Havn't followed this that closely but have caught the highlights on the news and it made me sick to the stomach. Also have seen the police investigating the phone hacking case have gone and spoken to the parents of the soham victims if they find any hacking or anything in that case then the book should be picked up and thrown as hard as law will allow.

I really do hope that this will finally open the eye's of many to what a disreputable scumbag filled organisation news international is. They seem to seek only to have us all at each others throats and be out to cause as much pain and harm as they can truly despicable bunch of people.

I cannot see how they can continue to carry on without at least a sacrificial lamb thrown to the wolves but i doubt we will ever see the real decision makers who authorised this taking the responsibility or getting what they deserve. People of the UK wake up smell them for what they are and never give them another penny of your money.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35268893)

Unfortunately, it's not just News International - the word on the street is that the Mail, the Guardian, and the Mirror have all dirtied their hands in this way....

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35268893)

Unfortunately, it's not just News International - the word on the street is that the Mail, the Guardian, and the Mirror have all dirtied their hands in this way....

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35268893)

Unfortunately, it's not just News International - the word on the street is that the Mail, the Guardian, and the Mirror have all dirtied their hands in this way....

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268901)

If this is the case they all should have the book thrown at them.

Lets see what happens after Wednesday when the MP's debate what has happened?
Just found these?

http://hackinginquiry.org/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog...g-live-updates

Originally Posted by TheDon (Post 35268879)

The law is there to protect everyone, your stance is quite frankly absurd. It's the same crime regardless of who the victim was, and should be punished in the same way regardless.

Originally Posted by Matt D (Post 35268908)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/ju...-phone-hacking

"Inconceivable"...

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35268893)

Unfortunately, it's not just News International - the word on the street is that the Mail, the Guardian, and the Mirror have all dirtied their hands in this way....

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268901)

If this is the case they all should have the book thrown at them.

Lets see what happens after Wednesday when the MP's debate what has happened?
Just found these?

http://hackinginquiry.org/

Originally Posted by Matt D (Post 35268924)

Signed.

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35268935)

How about signing 38 degrees petition against Murdoch getting even more of BskyB?

http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/m...ition#petition

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268940)

Originally Posted by Matt D (Post 35268908)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/ju...-phone-hacking

"Inconceivable"...

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35268962)

Sounds like the same might apply to RB..

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35268962)

Odd how The Sun which usually such a campaigner for "what is right" is silent on this.

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35268982)

Is this the only of their papers which is silent?

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35268993)

I was actually being sarcastic. I'd be surprised if ANY of the murdoch rags said anything about this beyond the bland apologies and promises already made.

As for RB not being aware, Channel 4 appear to think differently, and I'd be shocked if she was totally unaware of something like this because, regardless of the legality of it, it would make their main advertisers nervous. Nervous advertisers don't spend money, and the NOTW stands to a lot of money from each company.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35268984)

RB = Rebekah Brooks

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35268993)

I was actually being sarcastic. I'd be surprised if ANY of the murdoch rags said anything about this beyond the bland apologies and promises already made.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35268997)

The Times had it on their front page, both paper and online.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35268984)

RB = Rebekah Brooks

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35269007)

Looks like that the cat fighting has started internally:erm:

Originally Posted by Ravenheart (Post 35269016)

Relatives of 7/7 bombings may have been hacked too


Source

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35269018)

Nah. I think The Times' readership would be troubled not to read about this story. The Times needs to act with greater independence from it's parent company to maintain it's credibility and it's brand. Murdoch isn't stupid, if he used it in the same way he uses The Sun/The News of the World then it wouldn't have the same value to him. It would serious damage the strength of the property.

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35268935)

How about signing 38 degrees petition against Murdoch getting even more of BskyB?

http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/m...ition#petition

Originally Posted by The Guardian

Detectives to examine every case involving attacks on children since 2001 in response to Milly Dowler phone hacking

Police officers investigating phone hacking by the News of the World are turning their attention to examine every high-profile case involving the murder, abduction or attack on any child since 2001 in response to the revelation that journalists from the tabloid newspaper hacked into the voicemail messages of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler.

The move is a direct response to the Guardian's exclusive story on Monday that a private investigator working for the News International tabloid, Glenn Mulcaire, caused her parents to wrongly believe she was still alive – and interfered with police inquiries into her disappearance – by hacking into the teenager's mobile phone and deleting messages.

The case of Madeleine McCann is expected to be one of the first to be re-examined by detectives from Scotland Yard's new inquiry into the phone hacking, Operation Weeting. Other cases likely to be re-examined include 15-year-old Danielle Jones, who was abducted and murdered in East Tilbury, Essex, in 2001 by her uncle, Stuart Campbell.

Officers from Operation Weeting have already told the parents of the girls killed in Soham in 2002 by Ian Huntley that their mobiles had been hacked. Documents seized by the Metropolitan police in a 2006 raid on Mulcaire's home show he targeted Leslie Chapman, the father of Jessica Chapman.

(snip)

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35268935)

How about signing 38 degrees petition against Murdoch getting even more of BskyB?

http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/m...ition#petition

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35269135)

Signed - How he can now be given more power over the media market than ever before, with this looming over his empire, I will never know.

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35269149)

l for one will not shed any tears if Murdoch's empire fall apart.

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35269178)

Headlined on page 6 printed version or here on-line