The people vs PFI.
This looks interesting and it launches tomorrow.
Learn about PFI and how it affects you. "A Short History of PFI Private Finance Initiative (PFI) schemes were introduced in the 1990s under the John Major Government and were significantly expanded under New Labour. PFI is now in use across the NHS, Departments for Education, Local Government, Defence, Transport, and Justice with over £300 billion in PFI repayments now owed by the UK taxpayer across 700+ projects." In his first year since becoming chancellor George Osborne (who had previously discredited PFI) approved no less than 61 PFI projects worth almost 7bn. Cardigan. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Nothing wrong with PFI, if done correctly.
Labour cocked it up royally. PFI should not be a dirty word, it's a good concept and can work. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
|
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
You are quite right Maggy. The Treasury report in 2011 highlighted the shortcomings of PFI and called into question it's supposed "Value for money". It even went as far as to suggest it was used as a means to conceal debt. "The price of finance is significantly higher with a PFI. The financial cost of repaying the capital investment of PFI investors is therefore considerably greater than the equivalent repayment of direct government investment. We have not seen evidence to suggest that this inefficient method of financing has been offset by the perceived benefits of PFI from increased risk transfer. On the contrary there is evidence of the opposite. Organisations which have the option of other funding routes have increasingly opted against using PFI and have even brought PFIs back in-house. TfL's cost of borrowing is higher than government's, and yet it still considers this is overall better value for money than PFI. The incentive for government departments to use PFI to leverage up their budgets, and to some extent for the Treasury to use PFI to conceal debt, has resulted in neglecting the long term value for money implications. We do not believe that PFI can be relied upon to provide good value for money without substantial reform." The coalition, in Osborne, has even since then been throwing PFI contracts around like confetti. No lessons learned there, obviously. Like his predecessors many of his friends will be making a killing from these contracts. Still, PFI was after all a Tory idea so we should expect nothing less. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
States are supposed to deleverage during growth periods so that the stabilisers can kick in during recessionary parts of the cycle without causing major issues. It was, without a doubt, a means to conceal debt and remains as such. It will likely only get worse with the completely misplaced obsession over our debt and deficit. It would be fabulous if people were shown our current unfunded liabilities. That would put the alleged debt into some focus. As it is we're, including what PFI has stashed away, in a level of debt not seen since the early 60s and our recovery from the Second World War, thanks to a wonderful series of inept decisions by economic illiterates over the past couple of decades. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
As a mechanisim it was designed in such a fashion that it could be used to conceal / misrepresent debt. It was devised by the conservatives and the current chancellor is still throwing his friends bones despite having previously discredited the mechanism itself and having been warned repeatedly by the Treasury as to the dangers of an over reliance on the mechanism as a funding means. The succession of economic illiterates to whom you refer have relied on, and continue to rely upon, the economic illiteracy of the electorate whilst awarding their friends billions in contracts and further bolstering their wealth. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
A Tory idea which, in practice, was almost entirely implemented, manipulated and misused by Labour. The worrying thing is that, as with immigration, I don't think these were all just mistakes made by inept people. I think there was a large dose of political cynicism at work - short term gain at the ballot box which, the real price of which, if all went well, would either never become apparent to the electorate or would do so only after those responsible had long left office and would be living the high life on their fat perks and pensions. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
I honestly couldn't care less about which party is involved or how they are doing it, neither should be doing it. There is absolutely no reason, in the current environment of record low bond yields, for the state to even contemplate PFI. Our current interest rate on 10 year gilts is 2.25%. Why in the holy mother of copulation would a government be using far more expensive PFI? It is of course obvious - they can hide PFI from the deficit figures, and they staked their reputation on reducing the deficit which of course they've abysmally failed to. Just FYI while Osborne, Cameron etc are trying to get people to bow and scrape to them over their 'tough decisions' to get the deficit down, Barack Obama pumped cash into the US economy through a series of stimulus packages and, oh look, the US deficit hasn't gone up, nor has it been cut by a third, but been reduced by over 70% from 10% of GDP to 2.8% of GDP. While the previous administration entered into a number of bad PFI deals and were corporatist, this one has been simply sado-masochistic with their economic management, however the only masochism has been political, they and their mates are doing superbly thanks very much. ---------- Post added at 15:26 ---------- Previous post was at 15:22 ---------- Quote:
Most of the time PFI only offers better value for money when the private company have screwed up and will be going bankrupt as a result. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
PFI is like outsourcing - you need to know exactly what you are getting for the money, and what is extra.
You can't outsource a problem (without it costing you more), and if you don't have good commercial negotiations on the PFI contract (as on most contracts), everything that isn't in the contract will cost extra.... |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
You need to have some commercial wherewithal, the problem with councils and public authorities is that they usually have no clue how to run anything commercially. |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
People often focus on cost, not value....;) |
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
|
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
|
Re: The people vs PFI.
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.