Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
The democracy bit refers to the increasing lack of balance in the 2 party system we have. Without the numeric ability of the opposition to effectively challenge the Government in power, we get bad government. If the opposition are reduced by a number by twice the amount of the government's this just adds to the imbalance. Hugh, you may even agree with me on this? ;) |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
waaah
It's been unequal for years, this is simple balancing, it would have been done in the last Govt but Cleggy threw a wobbler. This is a good thing. 1. Equal sized constituencies 2. Less politicians, which in turn equals less costs to us regardless of the political party. TL/DR Now the Country is split into equal sized chunks - good for real democracy. |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
This is his own fault. He is awful at dealing with the media. For example it's bad enough that he equivocates on the issue of the Falklands but any half-decent politician would bat any questions about it away easily. He suggests a possible 'deal' with Argentina. He is rubbish at dealing with his party. He puts nonsense people in serious posts. He announces policy decisions without even consulting the shadow minister responsible for that policy area. He or his allies get the Momentum mob to do hatchet jobs on MPs who are viewed as unsupportive before backing away. They're awful at general politics as well. Corbyn is far too slow at PMQs. Cameron makes mistakes in answers which Corbyn never seems to spot and instead moves away to a different question. There have been times where Cameron is clearly struggling with a topic and Corbyn could go for it but then he suddenly changes tact and lets him off. The day of the Doctors strike he asked about housing, when the Tories are infighting about Europe he asks about Doctors and I assume if there was a massive scandal about housing Corbyn would ask about trade union reforms. Instead what happens if Labour's press office issues condemnations or criticisms of what Cameron has said in PMQs after the fact because their leader was too slow to do it in person. It gets even worse if they think Cameron was mean because they love that more than anything. The next few days are then dominated by Labour complaining that Cameron wasn't very nice to them. |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
Having constituencies of equal size is an absolute no-brainier. Yet political reality is that the only time this sort of reform is ever going to happen is when the party that is disadvantaged by the status quo gets into power. Labour can squeal all it likes, but it's just hypocrisy. |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
1 Attachment(s)
Chris said it all very accurately.
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
These changes will ensure that a vote in the commons will be a lesser risk and they are putting plans together to gag the Lords ... ---------- Post added at 10:39 ---------- Previous post was at 10:38 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
Labour and hypocrisy? Who'd have thought... |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
btw, I agree with you about the dangers of not having an effective opposition, but I don't think we should gerrymander the constituencies to protect the Labour vote. |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Not only do I agree with Chris, but Hugh too
No hoots needed (two btw not too) |
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Agreed - we need to reform the voting system, but the two parties that could do that, won't...
|
Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
Quote:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...tright-6470638 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.