Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35899635)

NYT and Washington Post have shown they have a complete axe to grind with Trump, so much so that even most of those who can't stand Trump even see the obsessive behaviour. I read the NYT article but I always read comments section and there was few calling out BS and that they needed to start naming sources, far too easy to concoct a story from thin air and claim it's from an anonymous source.

It was so corny that these two liberal news outlets both posted a story at the time Trump boarded Air Force one.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35899638)

Sometimes you simply only have anonymous sources to go on. It's not a case of "Do the invoices exist?" or "Is there an x-ray?" Journalists have to make judgments. Poor judgments will result in those newspapers failing. The fact that the New York Times has been going since 1851 and has a robust investigative record suggests the paper generally gets it right.

There will obviously be a few Trumpsters or Hillaryheads commenting on every article but I doubt they're investigative reporters.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35899647)

The memos might come up on Wednesday. Anonymous sources won't go away, it's too hard to get news otherwise, they're common in both right and left wing media.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35899634)

It is an authoritative source

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35899661)

So, why didn't they come clean on the true aims of the Bilderberg group? They were at the meetings. They were thanked by David Rockefeller for hiding the Bilderberg true agenda.

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35899661)

So, why didn't they come clean on the true aims of the Bilderberg group? They were at the meetings. They were thanked by David Rockefeller for hiding the Bilderberg true agenda.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35899673)

So, do the Bilderberg Group run the Illuminati, or is it the other way around?

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35899681)

Pity the buffoon can't remember his previous tweets

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...39957426999297

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35899697)

Pity you are unable to process the idea they came to some understanding before they landed, perhaps the Saudis warming to Women's rights which is surely progress from two years ago? :rolleyes:

Never mind I suppose the $300 Billion Arms deal they just made means the Saudi King was not that upset with FLOTUS.

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35899698)

Christ Mick you really are blinkered. The bloke tweeted a snipe at the previous presidents wife and then his wife did exactly the same.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35899701)

So bloody what? Is life that boring for you, head stuck in the past ?

As I said, perhaps they came to some arrangement. Nothing to do with being blinkered. I don't have the time to be blinkered.

Also try not to be blasphemous, there are devout Christians about this forum who will not appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35899702)

please don't swear this forum member doesn't like it.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35899701)

So bloody what? Is life that boring for you, head stuck in the past ?

As I said, perhaps they came to some arrangement. Nothing to do with being blinkered. I don't have the time to be blinkered.

Also try not to be blasphemous, there are Devout Christians about this forum who will not appreciate it.