Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Corbyn's kerfuffle (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702119)

Osem 24-03-2016 13:05

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Not only is Chuka Umunna apparently 'hostile' to Corbyn but he's not 'politically black' to add to his shortcomings...

Quote:

Labour was hit by a race row today as an activist in the Momentum group, which backs Jeremy Corbyn, was accused of branding party MP Chuka Umunna as not “politically black”.

The highly charged words came in a speech by academic Marlene Ellis, a member of Mr Umunna’s local party.

They were taken by some as a direct assault on the leading moderate MP, who was listed as “hostile” to his party’s leader Mr Corbyn in a leaked loyalty list.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3210861.html

Mr K 24-03-2016 18:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a6950456.html
Corbyn overtakes Cameron - oh dear !

heero_yuy 24-03-2016 18:32

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Yes, spineless Europhile pays price for capitulation to Brussels elite.

denphone 24-03-2016 18:34

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35828979)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a6950456.html
Corbyn overtakes Cameron - oh dear !

And 60 per cent are dissatisfied with chancellor George Osborne after his calamity of a budget.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3210916.html

Osem 24-03-2016 20:53

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35828985)
And 60 per cent are dissatisfied with chancellor George Osborne after his calamity of a budget.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3210916.html

I'll wager the figure would be a great deal higher if we'd just had one delivered by Corbyn's chief clown McDonnell.

Hugh 24-03-2016 21:21

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35828979)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a6950456.html
Corbyn overtakes Cameron - oh dear !

Heh heh...
Quote:

According to an analysis conducted by Rob Ford, professor of political science at the University of Manchester, Mr Corbyn has better ratings than Gordon Brown and Michael Foot six months into their leaderships.

He is however far behind Tony Blair, John Smith, Neil Kinnock, and slightly behind Ed Miliband.

denphone 24-03-2016 21:26

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35829024)
I'll wager the figure would be a great deal higher if we'd just had one delivered by Corbyn's chief clown McDonnell.

Unlikely to happen as there will probably be a new Labour leader before 2020.

Mr K 24-03-2016 21:33

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35829034)
Unlikely to happen as there will probably be a new Labour leader before 2020.

Quite possibly, but as Labour are now ahead in the polls, Jezza ain't doing that bad.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics...-election-lead

Damien 24-03-2016 23:04

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The Tories are too busy scuttling their own ship.

denphone 25-03-2016 07:15

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35829062)
The Tories are too busy scuttling their own ship.

Well the last two weeks has been utterly disastrous for them as we all know.

---------- Post added at 07:15 ---------- Previous post was at 07:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35829036)
Quite possibly, but as Labour are now ahead in the polls, Jezza ain't doing that bad.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics...-election-lead

Probably more to do with the Tories being increasingly hock deep in their own homemade quagmire.

Osem 13-04-2016 20:15

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn's got another problem on his hands it seems:

Quote:

Labour has a problem with anti-Semitism.

Remember the councillor who thought Hitler was the greatest man in history?

Remember the candidate who suggested asking the so-called Islamic State why it wasn't attacking Israel?

Remember the student who said a large part of the Oxford University Labour Club had a "problem with Jews"?

Imagine the reaction, Jewish figures say, if these were stories about any other minority.

They appear with politically damaging regularity.

Now, though, it seems change will come.

Activists and MPs have told BBC Radio 4's Today programme they are trying to toughen the rules on anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and racism.

Even if they fail, I'm told a party review by Labour peer Lady Royall into allegations of anti-Semitism may well also suggest rewriting the rulebook.

Poisonous atmosphere

That is highly unlikely to be the end of this story, though, because it goes to the heart of a poisonous atmosphere in parts of the Labour movement.

Jeremy Corbyn's critics - who are many and vociferous - put the blame at his door.

It is he, they say, who has attracted new members with these views, who has condemned anti-Semitism but not acted and who has - on occasion - made what they think are utterly inadequate responses to offensive language.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36034657

I wonder if he'll find time to deal with this in between such pressing issues as deciding which texts and emails to read out during PMQ's.

Hugh 20-04-2016 13:48

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Nice to see the 2nd most senior person in the Labour Party being such a strong believer in the democratic process.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/p...cle4735902.ece (behind paywall)

Quote:

McDonnell urges protesters to topple the government

"Mr McDonnell said. “If we can work in solidarity together, we don’t have to wait to the election in 2020. We have got to work to bring this government down at the first opportunity.”

Osem 20-04-2016 13:53

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
It's the same old stuff from militant people who certainly only believe in democracy when it suits them. When it doesn't they resort to the power of the mob and intimidation just as they did in the 1970's. They always have and always will.

Sirius 20-04-2016 15:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35833422)
It's the same old stuff from militant people who certainly only believe in democracy when it suits them. When it doesn't they resort to the power of the mob and intimidation just as they did in the 1970's. They always have and always will.

Maybe the Tories should be worried about any bridges they pass under in case a paving slab is dropped on them.

TheDaddy 22-04-2016 00:09

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35833421)
Nice to see the 2nd most senior person in the Labour Party being such a strong believer in the democratic process.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/p...cle4735902.ece (behind paywall)

That is exactly how democracies inventors intended it. Not this wishy washy one vote every five years where five million votes are cast for one mp sham have today masquerading as democracy today.

Osem 22-04-2016 07:29

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35833440)
Maybe the Tories should be worried about any bridges they pass under in case a paving slab is dropped on them.

Yes, that's the sort of democracy some of them quite like.

Osem 26-04-2016 18:08

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Oh dear:

Quote:

A Labour MP has stepped down as an aide to the shadow chancellor over a Facebook post suggesting Israel should be moved to the United States.

Naz Shah has apologised for sharing the graphic showing Israel's outline superimposed onto a map of the US with the comment "problem solved".

It was shared in 2014, before she became Bradford West MP.

The Board of Deputies said the post, highlighted by the Guido Fawkes political website, was "appalling".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36142529

Not sure she's really fit to be sitting on the:

Quote:

House of Commons home affairs select committee, which is conducting an inquiry into the rise of antisemitism.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...facebook-posts

Osem 27-04-2016 12:20

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Oh dear another spot of bother:

Quote:

Jeremy Corbyn has been asked by MPs to discipline a political aide who reportedly claimed that the steel crisis had played well for the Labour party.

In a letter leaked to the Guardian, six Labour MPs who represent communities affected by the crisis told Corbyn that they were “absolutely horrified” by the suggestion, which was insulting and offensive to people who faced losing their jobs.

Andrew Fisher was said to have made the comments to Momentum, a group fiercely loyal to Corbyn.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ed-well-labour

Osem 27-04-2016 18:47

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
... and she's been suspended:

Quote:

Labour has suspended MP Naz Shah over comments she made about Israel.

The Bradford West MP has been heavily criticised over the Facebook posts, including one suggesting Israel should be moved to America.

She offered a "profound apology" in a Commons statement for the posts which were made before she became an MP.

Earlier party leader Jeremy Corbyn warned her about the "offensive and unacceptable" posts and David Cameron called for her suspension.

Labour said: "Jeremy Corbyn and Naz Shah have mutually agreed that she is administratively suspended from the Labour Party by the general secretary.

"Pending investigation, she is unable to take part in any party activity and the whip is removed."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36148704

Osem 28-04-2016 11:57

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Well I wondered how long it'd be before Red Ken appeared in the news in this context:

Quote:

Senior Labour figures have rounded on Ken Livingstone after he defended an MP suspended over "anti-Semitic" comments on social media.

Chris Bryant said he was "sick and tired of people trying to explain [anti-Semitism] away - and yes, I'm talking to you, Ken Livingstone".

London mayoral candidate Sadiq Khan called Mr Livingstone's words "appalling and inexcusable".

Mr Livingstone said MP Naz Shah's comments were not anti-Semitic.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36160135

Seems like Labour has a 'serious anti-Semitism problem':

Quote:

The Labour Party has a "serious problem" with anti-Semitism, a senior Labour peer has warned.

Lord Levy told BBC Newsnight he believed anti-Semitism existed across the political divide, but it seemed "more prominent" within Labour.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36157027

I don't think Ken and Jerry think so...

denphone 28-04-2016 12:08

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The Osem press office is obviously pretty busy in these last couple of days.;):D

ianch99 28-04-2016 13:28

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35834838)
The Osem press office is obviously pretty busy in these last couple of days.;):D

Is it press or propaganda ;)

heero_yuy 28-04-2016 13:48

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Breaking news: Ken Livingstone is suspended from the Labour party.

No link yet.

Updated: Linky

denphone 28-04-2016 14:05

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
They should have kicked him out of the party a long time ago in my opinion.

Osem 28-04-2016 14:07

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35834838)
The Osem press office is obviously pretty busy in these last couple of days.;):D

If only that were true... ;)

As for Livingstone, well his whole career has been characterised by 'lows' such as this and you have wonder why anyone would vote for such a man, especially anyone who's old enough to remember the 1970's.

At a time when Labour ought to be running rings around the Tories, we have an opposition being 'run' by an inept, out of touch, idiot who couldn't control a kids tea party let alone a political one. Scratch the surface of Labour and you soon reveal quite a lot of nastiness not far beneath.

Taf 28-04-2016 14:53

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Now Corbyn is getting flak over his support for a charity which has released a film showing kids acting out knife attacks on Israeli soldiers.

Quite anti-Semetic (sic)!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ring-Jews.html

Osem 28-04-2016 15:58

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Looks a bit like the sort of 'play' ISIS engage their children in.

Osem 29-04-2016 21:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
According to Corbyn there is no crisis in the Labour part but they'll have an inquiry into anti-Semitism anyway... :rolleyes:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36175660

Can anyone imagine this idiot actually running the country? :spin:

GrimUpNorth 29-04-2016 21:59

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35835117)
According to Corbyn there is no crisis in the Labour part but they'll have an inquiry into anti-Semitism anyway... :rolleyes:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36175660

Can anyone imagine this idiot actually running the country? :spin:

Interesting read but I couldn't find the part about Corbyn saying there was no crisis in the Labour Party and they're just having the inquiry for the fun off it. Must have missed that bit :rolleyes:

Cheers

Grim

rhyds 29-04-2016 22:01

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 35835120)
Interesting read but I couldn't find the part about Corbyn saying there was no crisis in the Labour Party and they're just having the inquiry for the fun off it. Must have missed that bit :rolleyes:

Cheers

Grim

Corbyn denies crisis...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36160135

Quote:

ut Mr Corbyn said: "There's no crisis. Where there is any racism in the party... it will be rooted out."

GrimUpNorth 29-04-2016 22:12

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhyds (Post 35835123)

Thanks, I wouldn't have been so confused if the comments refered to the posted link.

Cheers

Grim

Osem 29-04-2016 23:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn's denial of a crisis in his party has been widely reported across the media so anyone who's 'confused' about that might want to pay a bit more attention. :D

It's odd how the usual rose tinted suspects are absent from this thread. They must be chuffed at how well Corbyn's running things and making the Tories look like a bunch of out of touch racists. :rofl:

Anyway, just for anyone else who's 'confused' about what's going on within what's supposed to be Her Majesty's Official Opposition:

Osem 30-04-2016 10:01

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
For anyone who's interested Livingstone will be on LBC radio very shortly at 10.00am. Apparently there's already been a media scrum outside the radio station.

Extreme bad taste aside, I find it astonishing that someone as experienced as him would make such an extraordinary error of judgement at a time when all the focus ought to be on their opponents ahead of the local government elections. Maybe Red Ken would be better renamed Blue Ken as he's doing a great job for the Tories right now.

rhyds 30-04-2016 10:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Apparently Ken has found supporters.

These being Nick Griffin, George Galloway and David Icke.

Osem 30-04-2016 10:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Well supporters like that can only enhance his image... :D

Ken's defence now seems to be that Benjamin Natanyahu said words to the same effect. Last time I checked Red Ken isn't Jewish so, whether it's true or not, it's a bit like him claiming using the 'N' word when referring to black people is OK because Obama used the term isn't it? :shrug:

techguyone 30-04-2016 11:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I'm no fan of Hitler or indeed Ken, but this would seem to indicate that what he said had some truth to it.

http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2016/0...id-support-it/

Assuming it's accurate obviously, I do wish the sheeple of the UK would stop trying so hard to be professionally outraged at the slightest thing.

Mr K 30-04-2016 11:26

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
It does seem certain countries can't be criticised without accusations of racism/antisemitism being made (crass though KLs comments were).

techguyone 30-04-2016 11:47

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I'd also add that this is a problem entirely of Labour's own making in trying to get the Muslim bloc vote. I haven't yet met a single muslim man who hasn't yet started frothing at the mouth if you mention the word 'Jews'.


Oh well it takes the mind of the Conservative Euro civil war eh.

Maggy 30-04-2016 12:02

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35835165)
It does seem certain countries can't be criticised without accusations of racism/antisemitism being made (crass though KLs comments were).

:tu:

---------- Post added at 12:02 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35835168)
I'd also add that this is a problem entirely of Labour's own making in trying to get the Muslim bloc vote. I haven't yet met a single muslim man who hasn't yet started frothing at the mouth if you mention the word 'Jews'.


Oh well it takes the mind of the Conservative Euro civil war eh.

You need to get out more...

rhyds 30-04-2016 12:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I'm still puzzled as to what exactly Livingstone was trying to say when he started the whole thing off?

Was he saying that because some Jews agreed to be deported in the 30s meant that Israel should be "deported" to the US in 2015?

Either way, his handling of the whole situation has been a textbook case of how not to act the week before an election.

Taf 30-04-2016 12:26

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I think Livingstone has done a really good job of moving the news away from Corbyn's charitable donations and visits to anti-semite terrorists.

rhyds 30-04-2016 12:32

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I seriously expect the Tories to offer him a peerage. They must have been praying for something like this to happen.

nomadking 30-04-2016 12:42

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
If Labour think is bad, if they decide to start looking at local councillors, they will see the true scale of things.:D

techguyone 30-04-2016 13:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35835169)
:tu:

---------- Post added at 12:02 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------



You need to get out more...

Maybe you should, I'm not saying anything I haven't experienced first hand.

Ramrod 30-04-2016 13:17

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35835176)
I think Livingstone has done a really good job of moving the news away from Corbyn's charitable donations and visits to anti-semite terrorists.

In other news:
Corbyn-Backed Charity Donates Funds to Palestinian ‘Festival of Hate’
Quote:

A British pro-Palestinian charity supported by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has co-funded a festival in the Gaza strip this week which featured young children staging a play glorifying terrorism against Jews.
Business as usual :D

Hugh 30-04-2016 13:27

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35835164)
I'm no fan of Hitler or indeed Ken, but this would seem to indicate that what he said had some truth to it.

http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2016/0...id-support-it/

Assuming it's accurate obviously, I do wish the sheeple of the UK would stop trying so hard to be professionally outraged at the slightest thing.

Actually, Ken said "Hitler's policy in 1932 was to move Jews to Israel" - in 1932, Hitler was against it; he changed his mind in 1937-39 (and afterwards, he really changed his mind).

From wiki
Quote:

Hitler's own support of the Haavara Agreement was unclear and varied throughout the 1930s. Initially, Hitler criticized the agreement, but reversed his opinion and supported it in the period 1937-1939.

Osem 30-04-2016 13:28

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
BBC TV news opens with Red Ken defending his crass remarks to a media scrum.


"Great work Ken! :tu:

Thanks again.

Dave."

Mr K 30-04-2016 14:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Seems certain areas of the Labour party are grasping at anything to try and get at Corbyn. The fact he suspended KL the same day isn't enough. The tv pictures of John Mann attacking KL seemed very orchestrated with the TV cameras conveniently there. They've never accepted the overwhelming result of the leadership election - however that's democracy, even if it means your own chances of power are less. One member, one vote, and that includes MPs.

nomadking 30-04-2016 15:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35835189)
Actually, Ken said "Hitler's policy in 1932 was to move Jews to Israel" - in 1932, Hitler was against it; he changed his mind in 1937-39 (and afterwards, he really changed his mind).

From wiki

Keeping them in camps became no longer an option with the war going badly in the East. He just didn't want them in Germany.

Hugh 30-04-2016 16:17

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35835198)
Keeping them in camps became no longer an option with the war going badly in the East. He just didn't want them in Germany.

Erm, that was around 44-45...

nomadking 30-04-2016 16:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35835199)
Erm, that was around 44-45...

Quote:

The Axis advance halted in 1942 when Japan lost the critical Battle of Midway, near Hawaii, and Germany was defeated in North Africa and then, decisively, at Stalingrad in the Soviet Union. In 1943, with a series of German defeats on the Eastern Front, the Allied invasion of Sicily and the Allied invasion of Italy which brought about Italian surrender, and Allied victories in the Pacific, the Axis lost the initiative and undertook strategic retreat on all fronts.
You were saying? According to a survivor, Belsen was just a concentration camp until 1943.

Hugh 30-04-2016 16:43

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
We were talking about sending Jews to Palestine between 1932 - 1939, not about the Final Solution...

nomadking 30-04-2016 16:59

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35835203)
We were talking about sending Jews to Palestine between 1932 - 1939, not about the Final Solution...

You said "(and afterwards, he really changed his mind)". It wasn't so much a change of mind, but a change of circumstances.

TheDaddy 30-04-2016 19:05

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35835204)
You said "(and afterwards, he really changed his mind)". It wasn't so much a change of mind, but a change of circumstances.

Or a change of destination. I seem to remember something about Madagascar pre final solution

Hugh 30-04-2016 19:58

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35835204)
You said "(and afterwards, he really changed his mind)". It wasn't so much a change of mind, but a change of circumstances.

I have to admit, I've never heard the planned killing of 6 million people (along with 6 million gay people, priests, gypsies, people with mental or physical disabilities, communists, trade unionists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, anarchists, Poles and other Slavic peoples, and resistance fighters) described as 'a change of circumstances' before...:shocked:

richard s 30-04-2016 21:15

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Plus 20 million Russians.

rhyds 30-04-2016 23:58

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35835197)
Seems certain areas of the Labour party are grasping at anything to try and get at Corbyn. The fact he suspended KL the same day isn't enough. The tv pictures of John Mann attacking KL seemed very orchestrated with the TV cameras conveniently there. They've never accepted the overwhelming result of the leadership election - however that's democracy, even if it means your own chances of power are less. One member, one vote, and that includes MPs.

Apparently the exchange took place outside the Westminster Media/TV studio area (where the BBC, ITV and Sky have their studios), a place teeming with cameras and people who can use them. IIRC the BBC lady that filmed part of it (an ITV staffer caught the rest) was literally popping out for coffee when it happened.

EDIT: Here's Chris Ship (ITV deputy political editor) explaining what went on

https://www.facebook.com/chrisshipit...7582798851660/

Quote:

Given a fair few conspiracy theorists on *another* social media platform have been claiming we set up the Ken Livingstone/John Mann car crash today, I thought I'd set out here what *actually* happened (as opposed to what some people seem to think did happen).

ITV News had asked Ken Livingstone for an interview after his chat by phone on BBC Radio in which he first made his Hitler/Zionist claims.
He said he would talk to us and he was on his way to the Westminster studios where ITV, BBC, Sky are based.

Our camera duly awaited his arrival, and when he did, John Mann came up to him and started shouting. You can hear how it unfolded live - as Ken was on LBC Radio at the time.

Our camera recorded what unfolded in front of us. End of. I call it reporting. It's what we do.

We didn't invite John Mann to turn up. We had not spoken to him beforehand. We didn't collude with him.

If one Labour MP wants to shout at another Labour politician in the street outside the studios where we have lots of cameras (one of which was waiting for Ken Livingstone anyhow) then that is his choice.


And it wouldn't be a very good sort of news cameraman who didn't follow the shouting as it continued inside the building.

At that point, other cameras and iPhones started to roll.

And after Ken had subsequently appeared on BBC Daily Politics, 5 Live, BBC News Channel there was - by that time - a phalanx of cameras waiting for him to leave the building.

And they all followed him out.

That's what actually happened today. If people want to indulge themselves in other theories - they are more than welcome.

But they are wrong ...
SECOND EDIT: Apparently John Mann was in the building to speak to Sky News.

nomadking 01-05-2016 00:15

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35835216)
I have to admit, I've never heard the planned killing of 6 million people (along with 6 million gay people, priests, gypsies, people with mental or physical disabilities, communists, trade unionists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, anarchists, Poles and other Slavic peoples, and resistance fighters) described as 'a change of circumstances' before...:shocked:

There wasn't originally a "planned killing". That came later as a result of the "change of circumstances". It wasn't a planned killing just for the sake of it. After all they were kept alive, although not in good conditions. There were even a large number of survivors(over a million) and iirc the biggest group of survivors were the German Jews, who I would have thought would have been first on the list to be killed.

The 6 million refers just to Jews, the others amounted to 5 million and are largely forgotten unless they have a special interest grouping, eg gay, gypsies. A lot of the Poles and Slavs were killed there and then and not kept in camps. How many of those survived, I'm not sure.

Osem 03-05-2016 13:39

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I must say, this made me chuckle:

http://news.sky.com/story/1688191/an...abour-campaign

(it's the last video clip right at the bottom of the article)

:D

Arthurgray50@blu 03-05-2016 22:57

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
There are strong rumours going about that, some Labour MPs, are going to oust Corbyn.

I think that Corbyn is too soft, with Cameron and should go.

Damien 04-05-2016 21:42

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Been sort of away for a bit so haven't seen too much of this thread when it comes to the anti-Semitism thing but it really is upsetting. I am not exactly surprised there are anti-semites or at least people who, in their ignorance, invoke anti-semitic tropes but what is disgraceful is the defence of it from so many people. I have seen far too many people defending Ken Livingstone in the last week to the point it's making me actually angry to an extent that doesn't really happen much.

The original Labour MP who retweeted the tweet I can forgive (although that isn't my place). She made what seemed a genuine apology (even more so when you read the passages Labour HQ edited out referencing anti-semitism) and somebody retweeting something without considering it isn't exactly unheard of. Whatever. But Ken Livingstone's comments where terrible and he keeps defending them and so do many in the Labour party.

I can't really articulate how angry this whole thing makes me. Expect to say that many of there people would, rightfully, never accept this kind of thing directed at Muslims or others but there is a massive blindspot to anti-semitism as if it doesn't exist. They do the same thing of pretending that it's actually only about 'zionism' but then use terms like 'Zionist media' as if the idea that Jewish people control the media (or other things) isn't one of the oldest and nastiest conspiracies in the book.

Livingstone should be kicked out. People who defend what he said should be kicked out. The party should make clear statements opposing this kind of thing without equivocation. No 'it's bad but' nonsense, clear condemnations.

/rant

ianch99 05-05-2016 07:17

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
What Livingstone and his ilk have done is make an objective debate of the rights & wrongs of Israel's policies far more difficult.

How can raising the subject of Hitler when discussing Jews not be offensive? Why else did he mention him except to offend ..

rhyds 05-05-2016 07:58

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The thing is, this would not be as much of a story as it is if Ken Livingstone had managed to keep his great big trap shut for once.

If he's not thrown out of the party (again) then Labour is finished.

Osem 05-05-2016 08:51

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Red Ken is the embodiment of a loose cannon and if he'd been of the right his political career would have been brief.

Ignitionnet 07-05-2016 12:48

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35835793)
What Livingstone and his ilk have done is make an objective debate of the rights & wrongs of Israel's policies far more difficult.

How can raising the subject of Hitler when discussing Jews not be offensive? Why else did he mention him except to offend ..

There seem to be two extremes to the Labour party. One that makes criticism of a group impossible by being overtly bigoted against them, causing guilt by association for want of a better phrase, and another that makes criticism of a group impossible by describing any criticism of that group as bigotry and acting as apologists for them - see Diane Abbot, et al, amongst others, for that side.

Chris 07-05-2016 13:51

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
That pretty much sums up the British Left.

Maggy 08-05-2016 09:21

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35836229)
That pretty much sums up the British Left.

So is anyone going to sum up the Tory right? They aren't anything to be proud of either.

denphone 08-05-2016 09:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Indeed they are both as bad as each other in my book and only by parties being rooted in the centre ground of politics will parties ever be elected to government in my opinion..

Ignitionnet 08-05-2016 10:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35836306)
So is anyone going to sum up the Tory right? They aren't anything to be proud of either.

I agree. However, mortifying as it is conservatives, small c, seem to own liberalism far more than than the fake progressives on the left do. The Conseratives in power seem to regard 1984 as a blue print on many levels, but genuine conservatives seem to have far more liberal attitudes towards many things than many on the left, even those perceived as 'mainstream'.

I'm pretty sure social democracy wasn't this way at one point. The red card in my pocket burns a hole more and more all the time.

rhyds 08-05-2016 20:47

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
For me, it seems to be that politicians now want to be seen to be "doing things", and any attempt to reduce their powers for "doing things" is seen as something that must not be done.

Arthurgray50@blu 09-05-2016 20:22

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn is a ****, as far as l a concerned. I find it a disgrace that he didn't even bother going to Sadiq Khan signing as London Mayor.

Corby wants to run the Labour Party his way, but he should have made a great effort to be there.

I believe that Khan, will be a great Labour Leader for the future, l trust him for what he will do for Londoners

The sooner Corbyn goes the better.

Osem 09-05-2016 20:41

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Nice to see Labour doing so very well in Scotland. They must be so pleased at how badly the Tories have done and it's not as if Scottish seats have traditionally been a dead cert. that they relied upon to prop them up. Nice one Jezza. :tu:

:rofl:

Arthurgray50@blu 09-05-2016 21:03

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Scotland used to be all LABOUR voters. But, the reason why Scotland is voting for that tasty woman - Nicola Sturgeon.

Is because that's how bad Labour have done. Voters just don't believe Labour anymore.

And even l am now starting to llok the other way. Even tonight l emailed Yvette Cooper. We need someone like Sadiq Khan in the hot seat. OVER 1 MILLION VOTES

Damien 09-05-2016 21:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
As much as I dislike (politically) Corbyn it's not really his fault they've lost Scotland. What happened last week was only a continuation of what happened last year, it's hard to place a finger on exactly what happened but the SNP has successfully managed to tap into an anti-establishment feeling and directed that at Westminster. Not that Westminster has helped itself with a sometimes shocking degree of complacency. Meanwhile the Tories have managed to position themselves well against the SNP by backing the Union whilst Labour dither trying to out-flank the SNP on the left and trying to be ambiguous on independence.

As for Corbyn I am not sure if he is an agenda or not. He is either a honest politician in the wrong place or if he has a very clear plan to stuff the hierarchy of Labour with allies before stepping down having successfully taken control of the party on behalf of the SWP lot.

Arthurgray50@blu 09-05-2016 21:46

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
If you look at, In the North of England and Scotland. It used to be Labour strongholds.

But, now we have UKIP and Lib Dems taking over. With some Conservatives coming in.

Labour need a leader, who will stand up for the Worker

Hugh 09-05-2016 21:47

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35836561)
Scotland used to be all LABOUR voters. But, the reason why Scotland is voting for that tasty woman - Nicola Sturgeon.

Is because that's how bad Labour have done. Voters just don't believe Labour anymore.

And even l am now starting to llok the other way. Even tonight l emailed Yvette Cooper. We need someone like Sadiq Khan in the hot seat. OVER 1 MILLION VOTES

:shocked:

Damien 09-05-2016 21:59

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35836571)
If you look at, In the North of England and Scotland. It used to be Labour strongholds.

But, now we have UKIP and Lib Dems taking over. With some Conservatives coming in.

Labour need a leader, who will stand up for the Worker

I am saying Labour's problems in Scotland are deeper than the issue of the leadership.

TheDaddy 10-05-2016 19:33

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35836558)
Nice to see Labour doing so very well in Scotland. They must be so pleased at how badly the Tories have done and it's not as if Scottish seats have traditionally been a dead cert. that they relied upon to prop them up. Nice one Jezza. :tu:

:rofl:

You're right they have pretty much never relied upon the Scottish vote, even to win elections let alone prop them up...

---------- Post added at 19:33 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35836561)
Scotland used to be all LABOUR voters. But, the reason why Scotland is voting for that tasty woman - Nicola Sturgeon.

Is because that's how bad Labour have done. Voters just don't believe Labour anymore.

And even l am now starting to llok the other way. Even tonight l emailed Yvette Cooper. We need someone like Sadiq Khan in the hot seat. OVER 1 MILLION VOTES

I still trust Corbyn more than I do Khan, I am a bit disappointed with him though, had high hopes when Jezza got the job.

Chris 10-05-2016 20:54

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn is in complete denial over Scotland. Without the 40+ Scottish seats Labour has taken for granted for the last century there is no way they can form a working majority, and there are plenty of people in England who won't vote Labour if they believe the outcome will be a Labour government propped up by the SNP.

Damien 11-05-2016 08:47

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35836798)
Corbyn is in complete denial over Scotland. Without the 40+ Scottish seats Labour has taken for granted for the last century there is no way they can form a working majority, and there are plenty of people in England who won't vote Labour if they believe the outcome will be a Labour government propped up by the SNP.

Taking into account the seats alone Labour has won successive majorities which would have remained safe even without Scotland although I agree that with the 'SNP-Labour' attack line and with upcoming boundary changes it will be harder.

I think there is a lot of complacency about Corbyn though. He is a poor politician and I don't like this ideas especially foreign policy. However he isn't far off from becoming PM, or at least one of his allies. It's not too hard to see him winning an election. Imagine a recession after years of 'austerity', an electorate told they have to cut to save the economy only for the economy to tank, a Tory party infighting over the EU and the general anti-establishment and anti-incumbent feeling we see across the Western world at the moment. All of that is a dangerous mix. Corbyn has a SWP-influenced foreign policy that blames the West for everything but foreign policy doesn't swing elections. What Corbyn does have is a perception that his is honest and not part of the establishment. That is a good place from which to benefit from a rebellion against the elites, he is also the only choice for those that'll want the Tories out no matter what.

I think the Tories are wrong by taking their focus off the opposition onto each other.

Chris 11-05-2016 09:24

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I think your glasses are especially rose-tinted this morning.

To be doing as well as Michael Foot did at this stage in his leadership, Corbyn should have gained hundreds of council seats last week. Instead, in Corbyn's own words, they merely "hung on". That's what governments are meant to do mid term, not oppositions.

We had exactly the same nonsense throughout the last parliament over Ed Miliband, with people constantly claiming the electorate would come round, would warm to him, just in time for the 2015 election.

It didn't happen then, and it won't happen next time either. The man is totally unelectable, just as Michael Foot turned out to be in 1983 (and no, it wasn't the Falklands that won it for Thatcher, it was nationalisation, unilateral disarmament and a whole lot of other unpalatable things that lost it for Labour, despite three-million-plus unemployed, industrial unrest and a floundering economy).

Damien 11-05-2016 09:52

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35836868)
I think your glasses are especially rose-tinted this morning.

Not sure if they're rose-tinted as I don't want Corbyn to win.

Quote:

To be doing as well as Michael Foot did at this stage in his leadership, Corbyn should have gained hundreds of council seats last week. Instead, in Corbyn's own words, they merely "hung on". That's what governments are meant to do mid term, not oppositions.
My scenario is based on a shift of circumstances which isn't too outlandish. Corbyn wasn't expected to win the leadership and Donald Trump wasn't expected to win the nomination for the Republican nomination. Things we don't expect can come up and cause consequences we can't foresee.

Quote:

It didn't happen then, and it won't happen next time either. The man is totally unelectable, just as Michael Foot turned out to be in 1983 (and no, it wasn't the Falklands that won it for Thatcher, it was nationalisation, unilateral disarmament and a whole lot of other unpalatable things that lost it for Labour, despite three-million-plus unemployed, industrial unrest and a floundering economy).
And I think you're largely right but that it's dangerous to assume he can't win because your thoughts on this seem to be mirrored by the Conservative party and that complacency could cost them.

techguyone 11-05-2016 11:05

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
This
Quote:

It's not too hard to see him winning an election. Imagine a recession after years of 'austerity', an electorate told they have to cut to save the economy only for the economy to tank
Plus the really ****** stuff done by DWP & employment rights and with regard to disability, ATOS & the 'targets' that must be met at all cost - regardless of the claimant's condition.

If nothing else the Conservatives should be concerned, Dave's likely going to disappear into the sunset after the referendum regardless, leaving the Tories not only fighting like ferrets in a sack over Europe but also about a new Leader.

I'm not sure on Corby's views on a coalition, but that may end up a possibility perhaps.

heero_yuy 11-05-2016 11:52

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

What is extraordinary is that Labour and the political Left used to see the advancement of working-class rights as their primary duty. But now in their blind adherence to the creed of diversity they have become the brutal enemies of the working classes who find their talents derided and their heritage traduced. Where once the working classes were seen as the backbone of Britain, admired for their patriotism, respectability and solidarity, now those values are turned against them.
Linky

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2016/05/14.jpg

No wonder traditional Labour supporters are looking elsewhere for a party to represent them.

Hugh 11-05-2016 12:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Whilst not the biggest fan of Labour or Thornberry, I really wouldn't hold much credence with that site, as it believes
Quote:

A jewish master-race are running Western Society with the help of zionists ( right wing ) and marxists ( left wing ) – they both have the same end result with slightly different routes. A 1% jewish master-race and 99% dumbed down, multi-racial or mixed race, debt slaves. This is also known as the “New World Order”.
Quote:

The Establishment, Childrens’ Charities and all major Political Parties are run by and riddled with paedophiles, and probably are just one big paedophile network trafficking thousands of British Children each and every year.
Quote:

“Multiculturalism is White genocide ”

denphone 11-05-2016 13:12

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Taking party politics out of it there are idiots and malcontents in the all the mainstream political parties and anybody who does not think that there ain't certainly has their rose tinted glasses on..

ianch99 11-05-2016 15:22

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35836886)
Whilst not the biggest fan of Labour or Thornberry, I really wouldn't hold much credence with that site, as it believes

Sounds like a spoof site made up to lure the simple minded .. no one in their right mind can seriously believe this stuff.

TheDaddy 11-05-2016 16:34

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35836798)
Corbyn is in complete denial over Scotland. Without the 40+ Scottish seats Labour has taken for granted for the last century there is no way they can form a working majority, and there are plenty of people in England who won't vote Labour if they believe the outcome will be a Labour government propped up by the SNP.

But only once this century have Scottish seats played any role in the winning of an election iirc

Hugh 11-05-2016 16:41

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35836949)
But only once this century have Scottish seats played any role in the winning of an election iirc

4 times since 1945 (I cba looking any further back... ;))

Feb 74, Oct 74, 1964, and 1950.

Damien 11-05-2016 16:50

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Wouldn't 2005 count too?

TheDaddy 11-05-2016 17:02

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35836950)
4 times since 1945 (I cba looking any further back... ;))

Feb 74, Oct 74, 1964, and 1950.

Or to look at it another way, once in '64


http://wingsoverscotland.com/why-lab...need-scotland/

---------- Post added at 17:02 ---------- Previous post was at 17:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35836953)
Wouldn't 2005 count too?


No

Damien 11-05-2016 17:21

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35836955)

No

Why not?

Labour won 356 seats, 56 of which were in Scotland. They would have been 24 seats short of a majority. Fair enough they would be the largest party but to govern they would need the votes of the SNP or Lib Dems.

TheDaddy 11-05-2016 17:39

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35836959)
Why not?

Labour won 356 seats, 56 of which were in Scotland. They would have been 24 seats short of a majority. Fair enough they would be the largest party but to govern they would need the votes of the SNP or Lib Dems.


Looks to me labour had a majority of 66 and without Scottish mps it would've been 43. Anyway the real point is labour have never relied on the Scottish vote to win elections

Hugh 11-05-2016 17:47

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35836955)
Or to look at it another way, once in '64


http://wingsoverscotland.com/why-lab...need-scotland/

---------- Post added at 17:02 ---------- Previous post was at 17:01 ----------




No

In Feb 74, Labour had 40 seats in Scotland, whilst the Conservatives had 21, which gives them 19 more seats than the Tories - in that General Electiom Labour had a majority of 4 over the Tories.

Damien 11-05-2016 17:58

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35836963)
Looks to me labour had a majority of 66 and without Scottish mps it would've been 43. Anyway the real point is labour have never relied on the Scottish vote to win elections

You're working on the assumption Scotland has left the union I think but I am working off the assumption they're part of it but the votes have gone elsewhere.

TheDaddy 11-05-2016 17:59

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35836965)
In Feb 74, Labour had 40 seats in Scotland, whilst the Conservatives had 21, which gives them 19 more seats than the Tories - in that General Electiom Labour had a majority of 4 over the Tories.

That the first election, who ever won that would've collapsed and needed the second anyway so it really isn't worth counting

Chris 11-05-2016 18:34

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35836963)
Looks to me labour had a majority of 66 and without Scottish mps it would've been 43. Anyway the real point is labour have never relied on the Scottish vote to win elections

No, a seat change has a double effect on the majority, because it is -1 to the government and at the same time +1 to the opposition. The net change in the difference between government and opposition seats is 2.

Osem 11-05-2016 18:46

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35836976)
No, a seat change has a double effect on the majority, because it is -1 to the government and at the same time +1 to the opposition. The net change in the difference between government and opposition seats is 2.

Simples. :tu:

Hugh 11-05-2016 20:32

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35836967)
That the first election, who ever won that would've collapsed and needed the second anyway so it really isn't worth counting

Pretty sure it counted at the time...;)

Osem 21-05-2016 15:23

New Labour created unfair tax system.
 
Quote:

The Blair and Brown governments created an unfair tax system that made Britain a haven for the super-rich, according to the shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, who vowed that Labour would rewrite the rules of the economy when the party regained power.

Speaking at the party’s state of the economy conference in central London on Saturday, McDonnell said Labour must aspire to be another great reforming government.

“The last Labour government relied too heavily on tax revenues from financial services, and too heavily on off-balance sheet spending through the private finance initiative,” he said. “It didn’t do enough to clamp down on tax evasion and avoidance. It helped create an unfair tax system.”
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...on-digital-age

So even McDonnell reckons it wasn't all Thatcher's fault.

That should shut a few of the usual suspects up... :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.