HornetUK
09-07-2003, 20:43
Is the below results what I should expect on 600k service?
TEST 1
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:41:17 UTC
1st 128K took 1828 ms = 71702 Bytes/sec = approx 597 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1829 ms = 71663 Bytes/sec = approx 596 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1843 ms = 71119 Bytes/sec = approx 592 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1828 ms = 71702 Bytes/sec = approx 597 kbits/sec
TEST 2
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:42:38 UTC
1st 128K took 1844 ms = 71080 Bytes/sec = approx 591 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 2078 ms = 63076 Bytes/sec = approx 525 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1594 ms = 82228 Bytes/sec = approx 684 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1828 ms = 71702 Bytes/sec = approx 597 kbits/sec
Thanks to anyone who tells me what it means & if all is OK :)
TEST 1
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:41:17 UTC
1st 128K took 1828 ms = 71702 Bytes/sec = approx 597 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1829 ms = 71663 Bytes/sec = approx 596 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1843 ms = 71119 Bytes/sec = approx 592 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1828 ms = 71702 Bytes/sec = approx 597 kbits/sec
TEST 2
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:42:38 UTC
1st 128K took 1844 ms = 71080 Bytes/sec = approx 591 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 2078 ms = 63076 Bytes/sec = approx 525 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1594 ms = 82228 Bytes/sec = approx 684 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1828 ms = 71702 Bytes/sec = approx 597 kbits/sec
Thanks to anyone who tells me what it means & if all is OK :)