Erm,

[mrmistoffelees]

Before I paste this I am a completely legit user no cloned modems nothing

Check this out !!!!!!

Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:38:42 UTC

Test 1: 1024K took 90 ms = 11377.8 KB/sec, approx 93753 Kbps, 91.56 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 91 ms = 11252.7 KB/sec, approx 92722 Kbps, 90.55 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 80 ms = 12800 KB/sec, approx 105472 Kbps, 103 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 190 ms = 10778.9 KB/sec, approx 88818 Kbps, 86.74 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 95191 Kbps, 92.96 Mbps


These results appear to be quite fast - this page could possibly be in your browser cache.

To repeat this test from the source server click here.

[Toto]

Before I paste this I am a completely legit user no cloned modems nothing

Check this out !!!!!!

Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:38:42 UTC

Test 1: 1024K took 90 ms = 11377.8 KB/sec, approx 93753 Kbps, 91.56 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 91 ms = 11252.7 KB/sec, approx 92722 Kbps, 90.55 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 80 ms = 12800 KB/sec, approx 105472 Kbps, 103 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 190 ms = 10778.9 KB/sec, approx 88818 Kbps, 86.74 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 95191 Kbps, 92.96 Mbps


These results appear to be quite fast - this page could possibly be in your browser cache.

To repeat this test from the source server click here.

Cached page more than likely. :)

[Stuart]

You clicked the refresh button on your browser. No VM cable modem is capable of even nearly that speed.

[Nedkelly]

:D That can not be on a VM modem :D wow now that speed would be nice before they put a limit on it :D

[Gary L]

These results appear to be quite fast - this page could possibly be in your browser cache.

To repeat this test from the source server click here.

Now show us the results from the repeat test :)

[mrmistoffelees]

Cached page more than likely. :)

Nope last popped on here couple of weeks ago and have since rebuilt laptop otherwise would be in complete agreement with you, repeating from source however does settle things down lol

Repeating from source does bring it down to about 18.5

weird :confused:

[Jonathan90]

By any chance u use kaspersky?

[mrmistoffelees]

By any chance u use kaspersky?

Nope........

[xspeedyx]

well it must have been cached otherwise you would of got those speeds

my cache is faster lol

Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:42:03 UTC

Test 1: 1024K took 15 ms = 68266.7 KB/sec, approx 562518 Kbps, 549.33 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 16 ms = 64000 KB/sec, approx 527360 Kbps, 515 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 16 ms = 64000 KB/sec, approx 527360 Kbps, 515 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 31 ms = 66064.5 KB/sec, approx 544371 Kbps, 531.61 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 540402 Kbps, 527.74 Mbps


These results appear to be quite fast - this page could possibly be in your browser cache.

To repeat this test from the source server click here.

[Woolly One]

By any chance u use kaspersky?

Why would Kaspersky come into it?:confused:

It's not a silly question, as we use K. and I've been geting abmornally high(ish) readings reacently. 11.5mb for our upto 10mb connection.:)

[xspeedyx]

Kaspersky is known for causing issues like this

[Woolly One]

Kaspersky is known for causing issues like this

Ok - Thanks:)

[joglynne]

Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:38:18 GMT

Test 1: 1024K took 128 ms = 8000 KB/sec, approx 65920 Kbps, 64.38 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 450 ms = 2275.6 KB/sec, approx 18751 Kbps, 18.31 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 1041 ms = 983.7 KB/sec, approx 8106 Kbps, 7.92 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 2127 ms = 962.9 KB/sec, approx 7934 Kbps, 7.75 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 25178 Kbps, 24.59 Mbps

I posted the above figures in September (http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/19/33638118-browser-cache-help-needed-please.html) and having had no success in getting a realistic speed test result despite clearing the cache gave up trying to sort it out. Cheered me up no end to see that I was almost running at the speed of light at one point.:D

Last month, fed up with my trial version of Kaspersky nagging me, I changed over to Avast and by coincidence, or so I thought, the CF speed test gave me believable results.

[whydoIneedatech]

Wow what a connection speed! its infinite I think we should all believe these speeds as we are faster than Japan:rofl::rofl::rofl::LOL:

Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:43:33 UTC
1st 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec
4th 128K took 0 ms = Infinity Bytes/sec = approx Infinity kbits/sec

These results appear to be rather fast: maybe this page was in the browser cache.

[Stuart]

Why would Kaspersky come into it?:confused:

It's not a silly question, as we use K. and I've been geting abmornally high(ish) readings reacently. 11.5mb for our upto 10mb connection.:)

I haven't used Kaspersky on the PC for a while, but it might be that the anti spyware facility is either messing around with the Javascript that does the speed test (some do), or it is caching the files.