PDA

View Full Version : Grass is greener?


mentalis
29-04-2008, 12:58
Apologies if someone has already started a thread like this, but is the grass greener with Sky, or does it just look that way?

After reading all the horror stories on here about the way Virgin TV is going and I thinking of jumping what appears to be a sinking ship.

I have the V+ with XL TV package (as well as Internet and phone but I may keep those - according to Samknows I would be almost better off with a dial up modem than ADSL as I live more than 2Km from the exchange).

I realise that I would lose VOD (which I don't watch so much anyway), the bigger storage of the V+, the three TV tuners and the fact the box is only rented, but it looks like I would get a nicer looking, probably much quieter, box, more HD channels, more SD channels (even though much is not worth watching) and become a customer of a company that has money to invest.

Also, I might be able to replace the old big white satellite wok/dish on the side of my house (was there when I bought the house - it's just for decoration) with a smaller Sky one.

My mum has Sky+ and has had no problems. Are there any horror stories with Sky?

the-cable-guy
29-04-2008, 13:20
Sky is miles better mate, when iv paid for Sky in the past i only had one problem a faulty Digibox & an engineer came out the next day to replace it. the only reason that i pay for VM is cuz i cant & dont have a land line. not all channels on Sky will be to everyones tastes but then everyone is different, but everyone is catered for.

Hom3r
29-04-2008, 20:44
Both have good point, both have bad.

I know people who have dumped one and gone to the other, stating that they will never go back.

Shaun
02-05-2008, 00:54
I found Sky to be 1000% better than VM for TV - BB, mmmmmm

NO ONE
14-05-2008, 23:27
I found Sky to be 1000% better than VM for TV - BB, mmmmmm
i would go along with that and Sky b b is the best bette then any other Adsl provder inc bt and Orange :cool:

the-cable-guy
14-05-2008, 23:30
well once my subscription with VM is up im gonna get a second hand box subscription with Sky & then it'l be bye bye VM as far as tv is concerned yay lol

Chrysalis
15-05-2008, 03:14
for me the grass was greener but I went from analogue cable to sky digital and have never seen a digital cable tv service in action. But as I understand it sky have better interactive services like sky sports interactive and do have sky sport news. It depends if these things mean anything to you.

the-cable-guy
15-05-2008, 11:48
the picture quality on Sky is alot better then cable.

brido bhoy
20-05-2008, 19:59
the picture quality on Sky is alot better then cable.

I have just moved to Sky HD from a V+ box and actually think the Virgin picture quality was much better on SD channels.

the-cable-guy
20-05-2008, 20:04
i was on about SD receivers not HD.

WHISTLED
20-05-2008, 20:53
the picture quality on Sky is alot better then cable. See VM signal every day on crap TV's and have Sky at home on 3.5k plasma (SD box) and VM is much better. Fact

Wicked_and_Crazy
20-05-2008, 21:00
i was on about SD receivers not HD.

Im sure the Samsung i had and the V+ i have now had the same picture quality on the non HD TV i have

the-cable-guy
20-05-2008, 21:22
i wouldnt know as iv never used Sky HD or V + i was on about Sky & V not Sky HD & V + ;)

basa
20-05-2008, 21:59
I just moved from VM to Sky.

Picture quality on my old TV is the same. Reliability seems 150% better (no need to reboot every day). Functionality is about on par. Content is better (for us anyway). BB is waaaaaay better (I was on only 2Mb .. now on 8Mb and actually averages around 7Mb).

But the killer for us is cost. We were being screwed for around £82 per month, which for a better package from Sky is costing £52 per month !! :)

I now VM Retentions offered to match Sky's price but the TV line up and 8Mb BB were the decider for us.

allsorts111
21-05-2008, 20:53
As expected heavy rain and snow really do disrupt the otherwise perfect picture quality, there is more HD content choice, Sky+ works well and the Guide always works!
However, im now on the THIRD Sky box...

the-cable-guy
21-05-2008, 20:57
never had any problems when i paid for Sky we had a faulty receiver which was replaced the next day. never have any problems in rain as im using a zone 2 minidish in a zone 1 area, so i get 100% signal strength & 90% signal quality, other then heavy rain then signal quality goes down to 85% & the levels are the same for all transponders :D

allsorts111
21-05-2008, 21:05
I have no choice other than to keep getting replacement boxes, im not going back to Virgin Media and im not giving up the little HD content we are given on Sky to Virgins next to nothing service.
I just wish it did not take up to a week to get a new box everytime one breaks...

Chrysalis
22-05-2008, 11:11
the-cable-guy what are the different zones? signal strength?

the-cable-guy
22-05-2008, 11:58
zone 1 is mainland UK where a 45 cm minidish is required & zone 2 is north of England & Scotland where a 60 cm minidish is required. so using a zone 2 dish in a zone 1 area will obviously give you better results. the recommended minimum signal strength is 50% i brought a zone 1 minidish however they sent me a zone 2 one & only changed me for a zone 1 :D:

Chrysalis
22-05-2008, 16:11
Explains it thanks, I get 80% in good weather and drops to about 40% in bad weather.

the-cable-guy
22-05-2008, 16:12
? are you using a zone 1 or a zone 2 dish ?

Chrysalis
26-05-2008, 08:56
I have no idea what dish I am using sorry.

the-cable-guy
26-05-2008, 14:27
? is it 45 cm or 60 cm ?

Chrysalis
26-05-2008, 15:32
no idea, its on my chimney.

the-cable-guy
26-05-2008, 15:40
ok then.