lucevans
23-07-2007, 20:08
I've been debating whether to post this as 1)VM may not be aware that a few of us are doing this and may shut it down, and 2)not sure if it really is responsible for improving my connection speed...but it seems to work for me, so if you're having problems, maybe try it?
Remember those transparent proxies that were supposedly all switched off a couple of months ago? Well my local ones appear to be alive and well, and just look at the difference in download speed when I manually specify one of them as a web proxy;
First, without the proxy:
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:04:09 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 1141 ms = 897.5 KB/sec, approx 7395 Kbps, 7.22 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 1812 ms = 565.1 KB/sec, approx 4656 Kbps, 4.55 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 3047 ms = 336.1 KB/sec, approx 2769 Kbps, 2.7 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 5016 ms = 408.3 KB/sec, approx 3364 Kbps, 3.29 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 4546 Kbps, 4.44 Mbps
Then with it:
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:04:58 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 610 ms = 1678.7 KB/sec, approx 13832 Kbps, 13.51 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 515 ms = 1988.3 KB/sec, approx 16384 Kbps, 16 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 469 ms = 2183.4 KB/sec, approx 17991 Kbps, 17.57 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 1922 ms = 1065.6 KB/sec, approx 8781 Kbps, 8.58 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 14247 Kbps, 13.92 Mbps
Okay, the speed still isn't exactly stellar, but trying the "with then without" comparison on several different speed tests, large file downloads and general web browsing does seem to suggest that at peak times, the proxy wins hands-down.
Is anyone else using this trick?
Bob
Remember those transparent proxies that were supposedly all switched off a couple of months ago? Well my local ones appear to be alive and well, and just look at the difference in download speed when I manually specify one of them as a web proxy;
First, without the proxy:
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:04:09 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 1141 ms = 897.5 KB/sec, approx 7395 Kbps, 7.22 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 1812 ms = 565.1 KB/sec, approx 4656 Kbps, 4.55 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 3047 ms = 336.1 KB/sec, approx 2769 Kbps, 2.7 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 5016 ms = 408.3 KB/sec, approx 3364 Kbps, 3.29 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 4546 Kbps, 4.44 Mbps
Then with it:
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:04:58 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 610 ms = 1678.7 KB/sec, approx 13832 Kbps, 13.51 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 515 ms = 1988.3 KB/sec, approx 16384 Kbps, 16 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 469 ms = 2183.4 KB/sec, approx 17991 Kbps, 17.57 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 1922 ms = 1065.6 KB/sec, approx 8781 Kbps, 8.58 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 14247 Kbps, 13.92 Mbps
Okay, the speed still isn't exactly stellar, but trying the "with then without" comparison on several different speed tests, large file downloads and general web browsing does seem to suggest that at peak times, the proxy wins hands-down.
Is anyone else using this trick?
Bob