PDA

View Full Version : Naughty, Sunday Times!!

Russ
22-09-2003, 12:25
Taken from yesterday's Sunday Times...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2769-824304,00.html

...all of which is complete bobbins, Liam Young is STILL in the company, chairs were NOT thrown, and all this has lead to 118UK considering legal action against that downmarket rag :)
Bifta
22-09-2003, 12:42
Originally posted by Russ D
Taken from yesterday's Sunday Times...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2769-824304,00.html

...all of which is complete bobbins, Liam Young is STILL in the company, chairs were NOT thrown, and all this has lead to 118UK considering legal action against that downmarket rag :)

If they're only "considering" legal action I'm sure there's more truth to it than you're letting on.
Shaun
22-09-2003, 12:45
Originally posted by Russ D
Taken from yesterday's Sunday Times...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2769-824304,00.html

...all of which is complete bobbins, Liam Young is STILL in the company, chairs were NOT thrown, and all this has lead to 118UK considering legal action against that downmarket rag :)

Well that "down market rag" must have got its story from somewhere; how much did they pay you Russ :p :D
Russ
22-09-2003, 14:37
Originally posted by Bifta
If they're only "considering" legal action I'm sure there's more truth to it than you're letting on.

Actually no - I say 'considering' because the MD has yet to make an official comment on the lies, seeing as it was printed only yesterday :)
bob_builder
22-09-2003, 16:00
This story has now appeared on The Register:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/7/32952.html

so it must be true ;)
Russ
22-09-2003, 16:20
And the Western Mail seems to have picked up on it too - still rubbish though :)
MovedGoalPosts
22-09-2003, 16:26
Originally posted by bob_builder
This story has now appeared on The Register:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/7/32952.html

so it must be true ;)

But they do say in that article that they haven't been able to find a spokesman to confirm anything.

For an organisation that may have "financial" difficulties, any publicity that they dont pay for must be good.
Shaun
22-09-2003, 17:17
Originally posted by MovedGoalPosts
But they do say in that article that they haven't been able to find a spokesman to confirm anything.

For an organisation that may have "financial" difficulties, any publicity that they dont pay for must be good.

Wonder if thats why they did it????:spin: