Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow


You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Computers & IT > Networking

Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14-11-2007, 09:16   #1
cf.member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Derby
Services: Ex-NTL, now Sky+ VM 2Mb BB & Phone
Posts: 38
Virgin-Rez is an unknown quantity at this point
Question Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow

Morning All!

I'm in the process of re-installing Vista HB on my laptop and am recovering the backed up date from my desktop PC to the Laptop via my wired/wireless network.

The network topology is thus:-

Desktop - RJ45 link to - WRT54GS - Wireless Linked to brand new Amilo Pro V3515 with Atheros WLAN.

The laptop and the wireless router are in the same room currently, and are Line of Sight.

When I try to copy across a 1Gb folder Vista indicates a throughput of 0.98MB/s and that's it... is that to be expected?

I would have thought a 54MB/s wireless network ought to do better than that surely?!?!

Cheers!

Rez
Virgin-Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2007, 15:19   #2
www.stella-artois.com
 
SOSAGES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,229
SOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of societySOSAGES is a pillar of society
Re: Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow

i havnt seen any bit of networking kit reach the speeds it "ought" to do
if your wireless speeds are on the slow side check you have the latest drivers for your card and firmware for ur router.
also (and its a pain i know) try older drivers for ur wireless card - sometimes stuff happens

Id also try knocking down the security bit by bit if its super fast under a different security system we will have to look at other options.

have a play and change stuff
__________________
I've been dreaming of a time when To be English is not to be baneful To be standing by the flag not feeling shameful, Racist or racial..
SOSAGES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2007, 09:34   #3
cf.member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Derby
Services: Ex-NTL, now Sky+ VM 2Mb BB & Phone
Posts: 38
Virgin-Rez is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow

Thanks for the response Sosages.

I've taken your advice and update the firmware on the router... a couple of new features seem to be in the configuration pages but I'll look at those another day. In the meantime the network was still being rather slow.

I'm also having system lockup issues which I'm discussing in this thread here. One of the things I'm finding with this problem is that the latest WLAN drivers for my laptop appear to be causing the system lockups. Maybe this is an issue with the speed as well?

One other thing I need to get my head around is the different nomenclature I'm seeing with regard to network speeds. 54Mbps... 5.4MB/sec... I'm guessing Mbps is Mega bits per second and MB/sec is Mega Bytes per second, and so with 8bits to a byte when windows task manager tells me I am transferring data across the WLAN at 2MB/sec tha roughly translates to 16Mbps?

Rez
Virgin-Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2007, 10:57   #4
Counteruh!!!
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,215
danielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered stars
danielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered starsdanielf is seeing silvered stars
Re: Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgin-Rez View Post

One other thing I need to get my head around is the different nomenclature I'm seeing with regard to network speeds. 54Mbps... 5.4MB/sec... I'm guessing Mbps is Mega bits per second and MB/sec is Mega Bytes per second, and so with 8bits to a byte when windows task manager tells me I am transferring data across the WLAN at 2MB/sec tha roughly translates to 16Mbps?

Rez
This is correct. Mb = Mega bits, MB = Mega Byte
__________________
Oh Oh Ranje
We houden allemaal van jou, de spelers en het rood wit blauw.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wish I knew where I was going, cause I have to get back as well.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2007, 11:00   #5
cf.member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Derby
Services: Ex-NTL, now Sky+ VM 2Mb BB & Phone
Posts: 38
Virgin-Rez is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wireless Network actual speeds rather slow

I read in another post about NetStumbler which I've downloaded and installed.

This showed my next door neighbour was also on Channel 11 so I've moved away to Channel 4... let's see how we get on with that.

The other thing I'd like to ask about is the Signal to Noise Ratio. Which is better, a high or a low value? For example NetStumbler tells me I have an SNR or 58 and my neighbours is 11... I'm guessing lower is better... the next column seems to show that my peak signal is 39 and his is 82.

I feel like I'm going down a rabbit hole!

Rez
Virgin-Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:20.


Links
Google
 
Web www.cableforum.co.uk


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Cable Forum.
(s204569790.onlinehome.info)