22-03-2004, 15:20
|
#16
|
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: NTL Nafband
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pem
You have perfectly illustrated what I mentioned in my guide on proxies and what the techies keep trying to drum into people (without much success so far). When not manually specifying a server - i.e allowing NTL to route you via the transparent caches - you do not use one specific proxy - you use a group - when you visit different sites, you use different cache servers in your group. 
|
I think that this is the smiley you need m8
|
|
|
|
22-03-2004, 20:12
|
#17
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 425
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
This thread is a wind-up isn't it?
All net caches have extensive logs and can generate tons of stats, but does anyone in ntl know how to look at or understand them?
|
|
|
22-03-2004, 20:18
|
#18
|
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: NTL Nafband
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mmm
This thread is a wind-up isn't it?
All net caches have extensive logs and can generate tons of stats, but does anyone in ntl know how to look at or understand them?
|
Nope - Yes there are most likely stats... The idea is to stop one person posting that a cache is great and everyone jumping on it. If that happens the cache will be no good very fast... It will allso arm the decent NTL techs like justanothernoob and bbking with some information and enable them to get something done !
Not a wind up at all m8 !
|
|
|
|
22-03-2004, 22:48
|
#19
|
|
Make Tea B***H
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: <-- Not All there ? Knock Knock
Services: You cannot afford me!!!
Posts: 1,014
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stuartbe
Nope - Yes there are most likely stats... The idea is to stop one person posting that a cache is great and everyone jumping on it. If that happens the cache will be no good very fast... It will allso arm the decent NTL techs like justanothernoob and bbking with some information and enable them to get something done !
Not a wind up at all m8 !
|
but are we sure its down to cache server being jumped on or is it may be dowqn to ntl have not increased the cache server amount while doubling there customer base in the last 12 months
just wondering as its escaped before about ntl overloading the ubr's and cisco got sick and tired of ntl doing it and dropped support, so why not just let the proxies overload, blame the users and accuse of heavy use, strangle the system so everyone begs for a CAP
|
|
|
22-03-2004, 22:58
|
#20
|
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: NTL Nafband
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
I know cisco m8 and they dont just drop support.. Besides I know for a fact that at least one of the engineers that posts on here is a cisco wizz !!
You may be correct I dont know - I am not an NTL infrastructure expert but at least if we can give some decent info the NTL engineers so the problems can be fixed !
|
|
|
|
22-03-2004, 23:13
|
#21
|
|
Pete
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nuneaton
Services: Broadband M ~ TV XL ~
Phone XL
Posts: 156
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
I'm using cache1-brhm.server.ntli.net at present as without a manually configured proxy, browsing was non existent.
Of course, if the network was fixed properly, all this wouldn't be necessary!!!
|
|
|
23-03-2004, 01:35
|
#22
|
|
Make Tea B***H
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: <-- Not All there ? Knock Knock
Services: You cannot afford me!!!
Posts: 1,014
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
Can i Pay my ntl bills thru the cache proxies, I'd only have to pay once
|
|
|
23-03-2004, 03:27
|
#23
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Age: 29
Services: none
Posts: 5,597
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
using this proxy when transperent, causes huge problems for me
Name: cache9-nott.server.ntli.net
Address: 62.254.0.38
|
|
|
28-03-2004, 12:20
|
#24
|
|
while(!naked){--clothes}
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Services: anything for a new job
Posts: 4,002
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
hey guys, a few days ago, my IE connections would not let me onto the web I disabled the proxy which was from (another thread 2 websites were suggested)
cache1-renf.server.ntli.net & cache6-renf.server.ntli.net but I had numbers instead of the name.
anyway, eveything was working fine and i even downloaded Firefox 0.8 but now playing with these proxies I can no longer get into my yahoo account info? 
I always get the same message, 404 file not found.
This was my problem when i first was told to change my proxies. IE and Firefox don't allow me access. Any suggestions?
ik
Last edited by ikthius; 28-03-2004 at 12:25.
|
|
|
28-03-2004, 13:32
|
#25
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,385
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
The poplar pool has 7 Netapp instead of the 4 Inktomis - and I'd say they're working FAR better - I DO notice a need to retry sometimes though, but I think that's slow DNS.
|
|
|
28-03-2004, 16:23
|
#26
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 223
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
So what do you make of this error message then! this is what I am getting with out proxy, when trying to get to Kings Of Chaos, recruiting, arrea. and this happens every so often! drives you mad,
I am on the Luton 8
62.252.64.11
cache8-lutn.server.ntli.net.
And have found this error message
Quote:
1 ntl_site (Traffic-Server/5.2.4-59210 [cMsSf ]) ‹ÌZ{Sã8ÿªö;h¼ § „8,2»Ãã€ÙÙ_ºª â€l+‰ÇrÉ2!»·è¾à uK¶ã„ðÃm]ªÀ–,µ~ê—º
%µß_to~¿ì‘‘ûäò ‹â€¡Ã§]bMók_kšÇ7Çääæì3©⠔Ã*r#hyÒãõ
M³wntÖÛØ_³¾Ö1êÂs_-=é³Î/^0Å’ÂîË*òË*´ZäÅ*9"ö $é²@2ÂŸŽº×ÕÃZÛà =°ïçÓó_ÈH°ÂeŒ¤ [¦9â„¢LJ·H‹¤TrøØt¢à „ç˜%x5Ë*`¾eDrê³hÃ„Ë 4Ë*Å“â€*ÃŒ2$»—ØÖXâ ¢
öI<â€*‰¾â€Ã¶:I~Ã*È^(; YÃ… äá! `9ñ‚_mògÖ ýÃQABÃ*Ã*Âv%äªqð ô‡f‘O—OJHvK÷Û1Å’ câ¹rdÃ*6Ã*;#æ GÃ’j4Ã*Ã*öŒÌ_3¨fÅ*um â„¢sÖ»9"çGg=˸eÓ .L½{q~Ó;¿Âª“vHò`Ã¾Æ ’ÇHñj‡¸*Tüáp‡⠂¬â€žÃ”SpŸ‘çS ³Câ€*tÃŒ YÃ*{K ÈMbÓË*¹IÃu ËœpX@…‡â€Â£j¨â€Ã ¹U- dCчöB+¶I›’èÖ óý2a4äË*pÌ¢Ë*„Ë* š\Ò¡îȃâÂNú¾71Ae „
Ø‘îp—%ÂJ’Å*!K »&¥„„,EÂéùlœÑà *×ä‰zƒ¤X^W·H¥¶M67 ‰VR“Ô³4¶¼`2P? büs¹#å€N(@Ùe2kÃ*4â €¹EŘ™é·MÃ*µÛ6w§ Ä:ÜçÂ2~,«Ÿ
A|6ÂcËœâ€X%s%ýª]άœ8Õð±ÂêgtÚ†Ú>*±êP)—7 bģaBµvÀþ¢Â: Y9¤®›–SÂÕÃ*>ôà * næÌ%‹$´}èÃÇÔ LÃBFaÙ)} ‡:è¶¢Üa[‚¾‚éìp¾8c]⎆F fÃ*‡døÂ1‘Zt RŽJCoÃMév²!çFIÞµ4jõÕ œz9Æ’t'ÂBÃ*Ã]®ö&@±i0Ñ/WòÂß„bužâwÓ«ÃÓ ’§ÈX€<ÃŽ0Ó,ú‰l© v²3^‹ªž¢¢ÙZ6ÕUaà !¯Ã*ÑÃÅ*žáx Ã*– 8¤¾_0Ez`ºÃ*“YF?`“<¨Â\ ÄãWÆ’j.0g}M‡"ó’[[KLdV¯òÂùn)…‡Ã*†V9ÂìÅ* ëÃÃ*>÷jÃñïÜÞs†›-s_ù°2ÂÖOùjû‹œ˜ 9I-ÓË*ù!Ã*çÇ<â€Â¨|- â€JùÃ*„2x½P*•ç„ ád,ã'Ÿõ«É—W+e¥º \kÂIâõþ´R[æŸWgs÷;
ؼè<ß`™¨4榕Ó âäWY ¥Ü]ËÅCŽ· ¹eÂâ€*â€Â¡Ã¹Å¾H©±$ ºI Õ±±9‡e@¤÷±# s[ËH(1ji‘J#¼?˜ŸyBIÎë *®Ç¥Z»š\®M… ñ_o3Iÿæ ¤ña£™ðU1•Ìâ€*{0õ ~B‡cBU¦a ‡@VÙ2äŒÂ¢@ÂòÓŠ*6äß`Ñ:ëy®Ë T 7³ŒòÃ@§ƒO´ 1µ62ÃÇ})ÂhL ¦EÃ*á½úkèçAnþÅ*¯Ã*à ”'¸‹ñ$LRŽ$º·}žÂÃŽ —o«mâ×ÔBëx‚†ž\
U±ª¯ªòÉXÃ*Ã…T£Jà *ËY¸6äÿoÑ2âÂÃ*^ *(ì7G&„3•Ò¥—° hï`Ú- ¢¬ýù¡£Ø{2cÃgl‘Tà *¤Ã*Å¡VÃ̳=n#Â2Ã*û» N£Ã*jûõfÅ¡{—Ã*
6΄=Ö,S§Ã*jhA&ÚlÎÔ_bà ©Ã½;&äƒt+[æzf‰j¿JJÙzôVÃð!†(G=ÃGU&Å*‡ £e±WÞgæÜÃ*JÜF# €¹lnÙ’¸Ös‰è÷yà »Ã•Wò3&_ yËœoª9Û\J>~Â¥jüÃV¼ªj, ‹·ë¶7¸Cî¹VË*Â[¯±‚^Xre„\H c@^Ã’1 öȨ=(Â&ê¦Uqé ¡Å¡4óüÂu¼ÿeñØ‚à Âςc›‰_3*GÂ¥Âù ØÚO~äDÕ omo¿¯@´õ`€‘ ï Â-€),éâ€wVw̵§%:?Eü ³š{Õý½º‰œ´jÃ¥r µQ6ôÂ{|¼/Ëœ<â€Â¥œR½ôÌ3?`e†‡S\‘*¬#;X»ÈJ%Ž,¼⠺)L˜ü=™¥Ãb±qº%ÂZN ®Â¡B%!ÿ&Y£Pxw敖v— º@.9ø‹ébÓGÓ~¨Xl‹'Bâ €™Â·6šÕÂæþÃ*. ÃhÖ7Å¡ÂÂÃæF½¼Ñ´ ±Â²Ã‰6š»»µÂæ`£Ùà œhÂËÞF³‚E¨¬2UŸ\£ ó!ÉÃÉ
?câ€*wZG“<9¸ab¬nB^Æ’Å’Ã =,6ÃŒÃ*yîï»|¨Ã62‡ú& "îxÈ©kćªh}½>/žýZß 1·‰ Ja›˜Ë[•f£\3:×X£60Q2]Âq ¸£)¹âŽÃwÈ€¼Ã\à µEÃspÃZ¼^g¦ÿA½¨á_Âà ŒÃŸÃ¥â€žÂ¾Ã*aô8ø_¹%
ÃM-y¶súÈ’‰Wñ©îÂà ¿Ã¿Ã¿(oGÓ¾.
|
the only recourse I have had is to go through Kempston via 213.105.224.4, but this sometimes says server dropped. but refresh and it comes back faster! so I stick to this when playing and recruiting the KOC game!
|
|
|
28-03-2004, 16:54
|
#27
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
Since the Belfast proxy near me got very slow at resolving pages, I now use inktomi2-lee.server.ntl.com Seems to work OK.
Civilian_Target
|
|
|
18-04-2004, 23:54
|
#28
|
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cambridge
Age: 30
Services: Freeview, Sky HD, Sky Broadband "Max", BT landline
Posts: 10,225
|
Re: Overloading Proxy Servers
I've just switched to cache2-brnt.server.ntli.net again, as the Cambridge transparent proxy doesn't seem to like CF at the moment.
|
|
|
12-06-2004, 20:33
|
#29
|
|
Busy Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 45
Services: ntl Phone : Sky+ (with multiroom) : ntl Cable (20 Mbps)
Posts: 14,415
|
Re: Overloading NTL Proxy Servers
FYI - for anyone in the Luton area - the eight crappy old Luton caches have been replaced by five new netapp caches which should have improved web browsing in that area of the country.
__________________
Click here for a real, interactive, tv guide.
|
|
|
12-06-2004, 20:44
|
#30
|
|
Google it!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Essex
Age: 34
Services: Sky Digital + 16Mb ADSL
BT Telephone
Posts: 14,929
|
Re: Overloading NTL Proxy Servers
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pem
FYI - for anyone in the Luton area - the eight crappy old Luton caches have been replaced by five new netapp caches which should have improved web browsing in that area of the country.
|
That's everyone on the luton proxys then  Last time I tried them at home I could have drawn the webpages by hand quicker. Anyone seen any improvements in the last month or so?
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:28.
|