|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
yeah - its a bit like those authors banging on about having their work shown on google but at the same time having to contemplate the fact that their stuff will have a much larger exposure and possible sale quantity. They want it both ways. They want you to just know that they exist and buy their stuff "pig in a poke" style. That's the way I see it anyway - besides, if these 'artists' are in it predominantly for the sake of their 'work' then should that not be that in itself?
|