Thread: BT Confirms 8Mbps November Launch
View Single Post
Old 08-06-2005, 16:38   #11
jtwn
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 1,996
jtwn has reached the bronze age
jtwn has reached the bronze agejtwn has reached the bronze agejtwn has reached the bronze agejtwn has reached the bronze agejtwn has reached the bronze agejtwn has reached the bronze age
Re: BT Confirms 8Mbps November Launch
*Cough* You were saying ig?

Quote:
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping www.ntlworld.com -t

Pinging www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247
Reply from 62.253.162.30: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 62.253.162.30:
Packets: Sent = 38, Received = 38, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 9ms
Control-C
^C[
^^ Even with my crappy router (likes to spike me with lag ).

If ADSL goes to offering up to high speeds, I'm all for cable going that way too, even if the congestion will only be up to 80% of your speed (given that they offer something like, lets say...10mb ); however if it affects pings there is no way i can support it.
jtwn is offline   Reply With Quote