View Single Post
Old 09-05-2005, 22:32   #7
paulyoung666
Permanently Banned
 
paulyoung666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: norton , teesside
Age: 40
Posts: 10,571
paulyoung666 has a nice shiny star
paulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny star
Re: just 5 years for terrorising a pensioner

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Oh gods, here we go again...

And I have a belief in *Justice* and one of the first things that is required for justice to exist is a *FAIR TRIAL*, this involves the accused being presumed innocent and having the right to defend themselves or have someone defend them instead of a lynch mob saying "we think they're guilty, let's string them up".

And how would your conscience feel if someone was sent to jail or even executed because they *didn't* get a fair trial, and then you later found they were innocent? Don't forget that, thereby, the *guilty* party would have got away with it!

We have systems like this for a good reason.

*Never* forget that.

yep here we go again , scum supported by ppl who know they are scum who if they have a clever enough lawyer get away with being scum because their brief comes up with *****e like ' well at least the poor b@stard who was terrorised wont have to stand up in court ' , real big of them and the brief wasnt it , i know where you are coming from but the crap they spout p!sses me off summat rotten , i wonder how some defence lawyers sleep at night , it must take some heavy duty sedatives in my opinion
paulyoung666 is offline   Reply With Quote