Thread: QPSK Vs. QAM
View Single Post
Old 25-08-2010, 11:01   #10
Harlow CM20
cf.member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Services: 2 Samsung V+box 1 Samsung Vbox 20Mb XLBB Phone
Posts: 73
Harlow CM20 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: QPSK Vs. QAM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter View Post
Mines the same
Upstream Modulation : QPSK
Upstream Symbol Rate : 2560 Ksym/sec
Upstream transmit Power Level : 53.5 dBmV
Upstream Mini-Slot Size : 2

Not had any trouble other than last year when i couldnt host mw2 games but i might have been on QAM then

I pretty much can't host anything online unless I host just one or two people that are on a UK adsl connection. when my US modulation was QAM16 recently I was able to host upto 12 players regardless of connection type and location. Online play was very smooth in general even if I wasn't host and I could even connect well to players from Mexico. Atm I am unable to play online again.

As was mentioned earlier in this thread, if you can't get QAM then there's an upstream issue in your area, I would like this issue resolved if possible please.

Here's a few local pingtest results if it helps matters






Last edited by Harlow CM20; 25-08-2010 at 11:52. Reason: added results from pingtest.net
Harlow CM20 is offline   Reply With Quote