Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
I didn't. It claimed that there was a possibility that the allegations were true, but stopped short of actually saying it. That does not constitute as evidence or proof. Unless you would like to suggest that rumour and conjecture are sufficient. That aside, if the reputed reasons for the batteries' being close by were true, I would presume, as the boys' ages would indicate, it would then have to be proved that it was sexually motivated, in order for it to be considered a sexual offense.
|
Right. So why have the allegations of sexual abuse not been denied then? And please, try a bit harder than "they didn't think it worthwhile". Real answers please, not cop-outs.