View Single Post
Old 09-03-2010, 20:54   #56
martyh
cf.mega poster
 
martyh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Age: 47
Services: crappy sky+ tv crappy BT internet and phone still got my VM mobile
Posts: 9,108
martyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny star
martyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny starmartyh has a nice shiny star
Re: Unemployed trial slave labour.

[QUOTE=Chris;34977341]And that, really, is the heart of the issue. There's no point putting someone with an earning potential of £20, £30 or £50 per hour in a job where they will earn maybe £6 or £7. It simply pushes a chunk of their cost of living onto the State, in the form of tax credits, possibly free school meals and council tax benefit, plus it deprives the exchequer of tax income. If you're on £40 per hour, for example, you're almost certainly a higher-rate taxpayer.

But after a period of time has passed without that person getting any work, the argument that they have the potential to earn at a high rate begins to suffer - a long spell of unemployment is the proof of it.

Having said all that, and at the risk of making a sweeping generalisation, I doubt there are very many high-earners on the dole for the two years or so that will have to elapse before they become eligible for this scheme.[/QUOTE]

i wouldn't say i am a high earner but your point is still valid and did apply to me ,because i am qualified in a sort after trade i was not umenployed for long
__________________
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life."

Terry Pratchett, Jingo
martyh is online now   Reply With Quote