View Single Post
Old 07-03-2010, 23:58   #111
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 14,720
danielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver bling
danielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver blingdanielf has a lot of silver bling
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
Do you agree that Ashcroft lied to several people, in regard to his tax status, during the last ten years?
Actually, what I think he did was to use a fiddle. He never claimed he wouldn't be non-dom. He said he'd be resident, which is what he did. People mistakenly believed this meant he would be paying taxes on all his earnings, when it didn't. Apparently, nobody picked up on the difference between domicile and residence, and he just continued, as he kept his part of the bargain, which wasn't the bargain it was supposed to be.

Edit: look back to post 55. The condition was residence, not domicile. If anyone is to blame, it's William Hague, who apparently did not pick up on the difference (or didn't care).
__________________
Gimme back my dog

Last edited by danielf; 08-03-2010 at 00:07.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote