Thread: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
View Single Post
Old 05-03-2010, 03:26   #100
frogstamper
green and left leaning
 
frogstamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 48
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
They were looking to kick out someone who was not a Labour Party supporter. The European Court of Human Rights said that they could, as they had the right to choose their own admission criteria.
Thanks for the link nomad, but can you post what union this was, and the circumstances the member was expelled.
I still cannot believe any trade union would make being a Labour party supporter a condition of admission, if it was a union affiliated in some way to the Labour party then that would be understandable.
Either way a link to the claim would be appreciated, one which tells the entire tale.
__________________
If you are in danger of being overrun call in the Frogstamper
Rimmer: OK, step up to red alert.
Kryton: Are you sure sir? it does mean changing the bulb
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote