Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermevans
sort of tough on them that but i am sorry but on this one i would say then their choice is get the vans or have less dogs perhaps sharing with other forces
|
That kind of puts a dampener on actually using them if you have to ship them across several counties. I suppose you might be able to come to an agreement with the local scrotes not to go out on the rob apart from nights the force has the dog they share.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermevans
just because money is tight should never be an excuse for not looking after animals you have chosen to have be that privately own or by an organisation
|
Why do the Police (or for that matter the Army) not have top of the line body armour, vehicles, radios and equipment in general?
The answer of course is money. There isn't an endless pit of it and priorities and compromises have to be made somewhere.
How often does this happen?
Some will say once is once too many but being realistic would you want every force to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on vehicles that would rarely be used to cover the remote possibility of this happening again?
---------- Post added at 15:55 ---------- Previous post was at 15:54 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by punky
How about we wait until someone is convicted of it first before getting too far ahead. Noone has even been arrested yet, let alone charged and convicted.  |
Bloody liberal. We don't like your sort round here.
