Quote:
Originally Posted by lymmranger
Actually... to be fair this is a realistic (but tenuous) possibility.
I would not normally comment on posts like this due to not being legally trained but I was on the fringe of a court case where the defense was considering this as an option. I cannot comment further due to risking my job
Before you all jump on me consider the following...
even if the above was merely "cut n pasted" it does (read it) suggest that this is an option to be seriously considered - That the upside!
...the downside is - Who the hell would organise it????? - to "work" a LOT of people would need to complain to the attorney general and I mean a lot.
Surely a full time job and logistical nightmare, for a start the present anonimity of posters on this thread would have toi turn into real names and addressess!!!!!!!! and the number of people admitting to having recieved a letter on this thread isn`t any where near enough in my opinion
Right I`ve got me coat and I am off into the air raid shelter  |
People are reading this thread because they've received letters and want to know what to do. If they make the wrong decisions it could cost them £thousands as a result.
This thread is now 35 pages long. Way too much of it is legal advice from people who clearly have not got a clue how the law works. They think that because they can do a search on Google it equates to actual knowledge and understanding. That's all very well if someone's asking how to fix the remote control on their TV. It's a different story when someone could walk themselves into an expensive court judgement as a result of following their advice.
My response to binary boy was indeed sarcastic. I chose sarcasm as an alternative to plain abuse, which is not allowed on this forum. He signed up to post something which is absolutely of no value whatsoever to anyone who has received one of these letters. If I've upset anyone - and through the magic of PMs and the reputation system you can be sure that I have - then I really could not care less. My purpose to posting was to put a brake on the sea of useless and misleading drivel that is clogging up this thread and may possibly cause the people who really need the thread to lose money.
So if you want a genuine answer to the vexatious litigant question: I'm going to provide that by asking you another question instead. See if you can Google the answer to this: since 1997, how many companies have been added to the list of UK Vexatious Litigants?