Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
I don't want to get involved in a slagging match, of Sky and VM, but this whole business, wants to make me puke, Most of the channels on VM have to go through certain legal matters, as this would invlove Sky, so no one would win, with VM taking Sky to court is a total waste of money, we now have the news, that the trial is going to be next year, l say again, WHY does VM have to waste OUR money in going to court, to prove or win what, It is up to ANY business, to get a good price for its products, Sky has more channels, becuase, that is what the channels want, they want to be with Sky, VM will only have the channels, they feel are nessersary on there network, which is wrong, VM have to have channels that benefit there customers, I don't think Sky are trying to rip off VM, we all know that this is a bitter dispute, started by Sir Richard, when he tried to buy ITV, and Sky pip him, and he has a sore nose, why the hell don't they just sit round a table and sort the matter out, instead of lining some rich lawyers pockets, Arh.Arh
|