Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
Out of both sets of organs, one of them is being used in a way it was not designed to do. There are clear risks with anal sex which do not exist with vaginal.
|
Someone best tell the animals then!
What risks? We've mentioned lube, and condoms. So what risks aren't averted by those which don't occur via vaginal intercourse?
I mean, you don't have the risk of pregnancy, so that's one less risk.
Quote:
|
You're entitled to your view, the difference being I won't go blue-in-the-face trying to point out what I think are flaws in the system and taking pointless potshots.
|
How big of you, now I have your permission.
What with you giving me my morals too and all...
Quote:
|
No I don't, unless a more learned person can demonstrate otherwise.
|
So anal sex is a sin, yet I don't recall reading anything in the NT which states it is, only in the OT, but other things which are sinful in the OT are no longer sinful because of the NT?
Quote:
|
I have no idea what cherry picking is, it sounds a little camp for my liking. In any case was it you who brought the punishment of 2-4000 years ago (ie stoning gays) in to today?
|
Nothing wrong with camp, although I rarely associate it with the word "cherry"
You're the one who says on one hand anal sex is a sin, it's mentioned so in the OT (again, not recalling anything in the NT which state's it's a sin, perhaps you can refresh my memory), and we'll bring that sinful bit into modern times, but we will pick and choose, and not choose the punishment that goes with it.