View Single Post
Old 09-05-2008, 17:30   #16
Arthurgray50@blu
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 652
Arthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to beholdArthurgray50@blu is a splendid one to behold
Re: Virgin Media in talks over bringing back Sky

I think that the entire board at VM should resign, this dispute has been going on for over a year, and not once have they thought about the consumer, Even if VM paid Sky, £60 MILLION for the contract, it would be US, that pays in the end, they are now going to waste MILLIONS of pounds taking Sky to court over what, VM arguments are that Sky are dominating the TV market, total rubbish, VM won't, you cannot even use the red button, due to a dispute - yes, with Sky, Sky can produce more channels, more programming, better technogoly, and better services, at the moment VM can only show ONE HD channel, whereas Sky can produce these more and more, l believe that who ever buys VM, will say, right, l will give you £600million, and we will bring in our own people, for once, will VM think of the people that pays there wages, and stop playing court room dramas, as it is getting on my nerves. It was worked out when this whole thing started, that it would cost £1.50 PER MONTH extra to get the channels back, l would pay it, wouldn't you.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote