Thread: Pace v Samsung
View Single Post
Old 07-05-2008, 15:34   #12
Mick Fisher
You ain't seen me, right?
 
Mick Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northants
Age: 64
Services: Sky+. / VM XL BB and Be Pro. / BT Phoneline.
Posts: 1,446
Mick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation eraMick Fisher has entered a golden reputation era
Re: Pace v Samsung
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace View Post
The older Samsung boxes were just as bad as Pace boxes, the newer ones (2110) are much more reliable. Mine needs a reboot about once a month if that. Menu navigation is much quicker than Pace boxes and it's much more responsive than the V+ too.
I had one of those.
Mick Fisher is offline   Reply With Quote