Quote:
Originally Posted by supremus
The specifications say elitists don't believe their own eyes? I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say.
|
That
should it be written that a camera has trillion megapixels - elistists will 'claim' to see it - not only will they claim it's better - they will even notice
how much better it is (they'll have to do the math first of course
- and they will only be able to see it -
after they see the specification - you know the sort we are talking about - OK?
---------- Post added at 10:38 ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by supremus
Poorer that what?
|
Let me back track for you - You have just launched a couple statements
Quote:
Originally Posted by supremus
..It's quite amazing how gullible the masses are...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by supremus
..When it comes to anything digital, they seem to believe the propaganda..
|
here you imply anyone else ("they") using digital technology - is so - just because they're stupid - any other concievable reason has been dimissed out of hand
which in turn suggests digital = poor/worse/for the idiots only
Quote:
Originally Posted by supremus
... I'm saying the claims about CD quality audio and HD quality upscaling are simply untrue..
|
no body is making any claims about CD audio which is another stab a digital technology (coincidence - not!
) and is a very old chestnut - elitists can carry on playing vinyl, and shooting 35mm film (because they read it somewhere) - but to suggest 'we' are all stupid because we buy 'digital' is the definition of elitism - for the record, it's also crap as well
Quote:
Originally Posted by supremus
...despite what the great unwashed masses with their 28" $399 "HD Ready" sets from ASDA might claim.
|
ouch! - anyone got one of these? i'll apologise coz it must have hurt a bit
actually - prolly best if you don't post here unless you paid £3000 up for your monitor - better still a CRT with r/f in - otherwise you could be in for a real bumpy ride
.