View Single Post
Old 28-04-2008, 10:10   #51
Derek S
Cable Forum Team
 
Derek S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Glasgow
Age: 29
Services: SkyHD, Ntl Broadband
Posts: 3,507
Derek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute star
Derek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute starDerek S is an absolute star
Send a message via MSN to Derek S Send a message via Yahoo to Derek S
Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers View Post
Using your example, the killing shot would have to be proven.
For instance, 4 shoot someone in the bum, 1 shoots them in the head.
Should the 4 that aimed for the bum be convicted of murder when their shots weren't fatal?
So if all 5 fired off a number of shots, any of which could have been fatal and it's impossible to determine which one was the actual killing shot none of them should be charged with murder?
If thats what you think you should apply for a job with the CPS.

Thats why groups of people are charged together with the same crime. They are acting together for a common illegal purpose.

In armed robberies do you think the only person charged should be the one who takes physical possesion of the money?
__________________
There is NO situation so bad, so dire, so beyond recall or redemption that it cannot be made WORSE by adding a Social Worker to the mix.
Derek S is offline   Reply With Quote