Thread: STM Statement
View Single Post
Old 24-04-2008, 16:06   #221
frogstamper
green and left leaning
 
frogstamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 48
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: STM Statement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken View Post
I've always been a fairly light user (~1G/day) who was able to do most of my downloading during off-peak times as I thought it was helping to spread the load.

From what VM are now saying with STM I don't need to do that, I just need to ensure I keep under the limits. So, that's what I'm likely to do. I'll install some monitoring software and use 99% of the STM capacity as much as I can.

That will probably mean me downloading more than 5 times what I normally do, but seeing as VM feel that's what I'm entitled too I feel I should be getting what I pay for.
I seem to be in the same boat Chicken, as you say it does make you think if your going to give me a quota on my "unlimited" service, Ill damm well use it.
__________________
If you are in danger of being overrun call in the Frogstamper
Rimmer: OK, step up to red alert.
Kryton: Are you sure sir? it does mean changing the bulb
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote