Cable Forum - View Single Post - Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Portly_Giraffe · 10-04-2008, 07:05

Ref http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.htm (dated 11 March 2008), I have emailed Simon Watkins to ask him:

(1) On what basis do you think website owners' consent to interception is generally implied (para 15)? What if the web page presented formed part of a private or tailored communication with the user - for example, a commercial quote or a message?

(2) How lawful is it if opted-out users still have their communications intercepted and inspected anyway, just not analysed?

10-04-2008, 07:05	#2810
Portly_Giraffe cf.addict Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 101	Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797] Ref http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.htm (dated 11 March 2008), I have emailed Simon Watkins to ask him: (1) On what basis do you think website owners' consent to interception is generally implied (para 15)? What if the web page presented formed part of a private or tailored communication with the user - for example, a commercial quote or a message? (2) How lawful is it if opted-out users still have their communications intercepted and inspected anyway, just not analysed?