|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
Alex @ Phorm,
Given the misquoting of Dr Richard Clayton over the weekend on Phorm's blog and antics on Wikipedia, I am not comfortable with the prospect of a telephone/voice call. I fear you would be able to deny anything I may wish to bring to the attention of the public and that you may misquote me for your PR campaign.
If Kent would like to have a discussion with me, it would need to be in an open, online environment which can be logged by independent 3rd parties and witnessed by the general public. I would suggest a chat room where I can pose my questions to Kent and the public can see his responses in real time.
If Phorm truly want to be transparent, surely they will accept these terms?
Furthermore, I am still awaiting your answers with regards to the questions I raised concerning the illegal trials of Phorm Inc.'s technology by BT in 2006/2007 which the ICO statement today has effectively reinforced the opinion of myself and many others that they failed to meet the requirements of PECR.
Alexander Hanff
|
A private irc channel invite only and with +m on only voicing the ones who are allowed to talk would sort that out members of the public can watch but not participate.
__________________
I'm enjoying Aquiss. Are you? Now happily surfing the internet phorm phree long may my surfing be phree of spyware.
nice one Good luck all.no need to hang around no longer cable customer
|