View Single Post
Old 08-04-2008, 17:06   #3
BBKing
cf.mega poster
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,037
BBKing is a king among kings
BBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kingsBBKing is a king among kings
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Pete Doherty Jailed

Quote:
if that was anyone else with his problems they would have gone down long ago
Judges are actually pretty keen on keeping drug addicts out of jail, since it's likely to make them worse. Hence the 'last chances'. Of course, he's not gone inside for the drugs, but for non-compliance, which fairly obviously demonstrates deliberate contempt for justice rather than being, like drug addiction, the manifestation of a disease. To my mind that's worth a custodial sentence.

Jails are full of drugs, but not full of ways to get off drugs. In Doherty's case, however, he's much richer than 'normal' addicts, so the usual rules don't necessarily apply (he's unlikely to be going out thieving to buy heroin any more, for instance, but is clearly in a situation to pay for the best help money can buy if he decided to). I don't think going inside will help him.
__________________
"An inquiry into the CONSTITUTIONAL ERRORS in the English form of government is at this time highly necessary; for as we are never in a proper condition of doing justice to others, while we continue under the influence of some leading partiality, so neither are we capable of doing it to ourselves while we remain fettered by any obstinate prejudice"

Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote