Thread: Landmark Court case may see end to unfair bill charges
View Single Post
Old 28-03-2008, 16:45   #3
frogstamper
green and left leaning
 
frogstamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 44
Services: VIP
Posts: 1,647
frogstamper has reached the bronze age
frogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze agefrogstamper has reached the bronze age
Re: Landmark Court case may see end to unfair bill charges
Quote:
Originally Posted by haydnwalker View Post
Its six of one half a dozen of the other because:

Its only an incentive for those that pay by DD as if they were to pay any other way they would have to pay more.

Which is obviously penalising those that may not have a DD facility with their bank (though I think this is highly irregular these days).

Prices should be the same for all methods of payment...
I pay many things by DD but I still find it disgusting that those that don't sometimes have to pay more because of it.
I couldn't agree more, to penalise people by charging extra because they do not have DD capability is plainly unfair. Even if VM says it costs more to process non DD payments I hardly think it costs £5.
__________________
If you are in danger of being overrun call in the Frogstamper
Rimmer: OK, step up to red alert.
Kryton: Are you sure sir? it does mean changing the bulb
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote