Cable Forum - View Single Post - [Merged] Spend Money On Equipment Not Movie Stars For Adverts

freakfunk · 23-02-2007, 20:42

Sky aren't in the top 10 for worst rentention. If you add a uneducated statement like that at least let other people know. Do you know who the worst companies are? Ill give you a hint, Sky, who aren't number 2 - RHL is number 2

---------- Post added at 20:42 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ----------

P.s. If Anyone Read The Guardian Or Herald The Fee Was Â£20 Million That She Was Paid For Her "sponsership" - A Fee Virgin Was Quoted In The Inteerview? Thats More Than The Series Of 24 Cost. Maybe This Is Why Virgin Isn't In Broadcasting.

23-02-2007, 20:42	#10
freakfunk Permanently Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 52	Re: Spend Money On Equipment Not Movie Stars For Adverts Sky aren't in the top 10 for worst rentention. If you add a uneducated statement like that at least let other people know. Do you know who the worst companies are? Ill give you a hint, Sky, who aren't number 2 - RHL is number 2 ---------- Post added at 20:42 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ---------- P.s. If Anyone Read The Guardian Or Herald The Fee Was Â£20 Million That She Was Paid For Her "sponsership" - A Fee Virgin Was Quoted In The Inteerview? Thats More Than The Series Of 24 Cost. Maybe This Is Why Virgin Isn't In Broadcasting.