11-03-2009, 14:53
|
#1
|
|
Guest
|
Sinclair C5
Just seen this from a link from another forum its a jet powered C5 selling for around 5 grand.
Now I know in its day this thing was mocked and derided by pretty much everyone. Do you think this would be the same if it was released today? We are at the beginning of an oil crisis it will run out and we are all aware of global warming (if we buy it or not) If something small like the C5 could be built today a lot more efficient than before with more of a range would anyone consider them? I actually think I would. I know there are electric cars and stuff like that but small individual transport not just for the less abled afterall we see electric scooters everywhere. I could well be on for a good pee take for my view on this but I got a thick enough skin
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 14:57
|
#2
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Services: 30mb BB, XL TV, V+, TiVo, talk unlimited.
Posts: 3,325
|
Re: Sinclair C5
They still look like death traps though which is what would put me off. Cars, vans etc seem to have got much bigger since the first time C5s came out so they're probably even more difficult to notice for your average shool run, 4X4 driver.
__________________
Witty and thought provoking signature to follow......
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 14:59
|
#3
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Sinclair C5
I would not expect them to be the same as this. Point it chances are there are vehicles around that cover this. I think perhaps Clive Sinclair was ahead of his time
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 15:04
|
#4
|
|
No Technical Questions
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LCFC Blue Army!
Services: V + HD
V Telephone
V Cable 20MB
Posts: 2,530
|
Re: Sinclair C5
Quote:
Originally Posted by harmitage
They still look like death traps though which is what would put me off. Cars, vans etc seem to have got much bigger since the first time C5s came out so they're probably even more difficult to notice for your average shool run, 4X4 driver.
|
It’s the exhaust pipe in your face that puts me off.
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 15:35
|
#6
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield
Services: 4Mbs, V+, XLtv + premium channels.
Posts: 1,133
|
Re: Sinclair C5
A c5 redone today would be interesting. Outside a recession there is very much more disposable income today and gadgets knocking around. There are far more mobility scooters, mini motos and quad bikes so people are more used to the idea. Unfortunately whilst some cars have got bigger there are also more 3.5+ tonne vans and HGVs knocking around in the urban environment too.
Electric powered motorbikes is probably even more interesting a topic though!
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 15:37
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Sinclair C5
That sumo could be designed with 2 rear wheels for those not comfortable on 2 wheels.Electricity will be the future as more and more nucleur power stations are built to compensate for deminishing supplies of oil. I do wonder though what use the Arabs will be once its all dried up lol
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 15:41
|
#8
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield
Services: 4Mbs, V+, XLtv + premium channels.
Posts: 1,133
|
Re: Sinclair C5
Yes that's true you could add an extra wheel but I wonder whether it is particularly needed, as the centre of mass looks quite a bit lower on that than more traditional designs. I suppose a third wheel might mean a shorter length vehicle though.
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 16:01
|
#9
|
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 24,599
|
Re: Sinclair C5
I only ever saw one C5 in the flesh so to speak, and I was a front-seat passenger in the car that was overtaking it on a main road. It just looked so exposed and vulnerable. Someone with a higher driving position might miss it altogether.
__________________
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 16:14
|
#10
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Services: 30mb BB, XL TV, V+, TiVo, talk unlimited.
Posts: 3,325
|
Re: Sinclair C5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I only ever saw one C5 in the flesh so to speak, and I was a front-seat passenger in the car that was overtaking it on a main road. It just looked so exposed and vulnerable. Someone with a higher driving position might miss it altogether.
|
Absoloutely right. I suspect that the plastic body may not have offered much protection against Mrs 4X4 putting make up on or Mr 4X4 reading his map.
I'm sure though I read somewhere that you could manipulate the statistics to "prove" that the C5 was the safest road vehicle.
The stats probably didn't inlude the people who died laughing when they saw one though.
__________________
Witty and thought provoking signature to follow......
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 16:15
|
#11
|
|
The Terminator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Sinclair C5
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 16:17
|
#12
|
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 24,599
|
Re: Sinclair C5
Quote:
Originally Posted by harmitage
Absoloutely right. I suspect that the plastic body may not have offered much protection against Mrs 4X4 putting make up on or Mr 4X4 reading his map.
I'm sure though I read somewhere that you could manipulate the statistics to "prove" that the C5 was the safest road vehicle.
The stats probably didn't inlude the people who died laughing when they saw one though. 
|
There were very few 4x4s on the road in the 80s, thankfully, and those few that were around were not being used for the school run.
It wouldn't be too difficult to show the C5 to be 'safe' as there were so few of them on the road compared to other vehicles. So long as the few in use kept out of trouble it would be easy for them to appear to have a very good record. Pretty much like Concorde actually, which was the world's safest civilian airliner until one crashed, when it became one of the world's most unsafe.
__________________
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 16:24
|
#13
|
|
Nil Status Nisi Optimum
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 3,818
|
Re: Sinclair C5
I posted this link on another thread.
http://www.classic-wheels.co.uk/old_sinclair_c5.htm
They're considered classics now, and you can find them in several classic car publications.
Think about it in 70 years when we're all buzzin round in the latest electric/hydrogen or whatever cars the poor old unloved C5 will be a bonfide "vintage" electric car.
I hope the national motor museum has one.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 16:26
|
#14
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Services: 30mb BB, XL TV, V+, TiVo, talk unlimited.
Posts: 3,325
|
Re: Sinclair C5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
I posted this link on another thread.
http://www.classic-wheels.co.uk/old_sinclair_c5.htm
They're considered classics now, and you can find them in several classic car publications.
Think about it in 70 years when we're all buzzin round in the latest electric/hydrogen or whatever cars the poor old unloved C5 will be a bonfide "vintage" electric car.
I hope the national motor museum has one.
|
Thet certainly have one in the transport museum in Glasgow.
__________________
Witty and thought provoking signature to follow......
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 17:24
|
#15
|
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Wales
Posts: 29,870
|
Re: Sinclair C5
When I was younger I went with my parents to a campsite for a week and they had C5s for hire - you couldn't keep me off the thing. Only problem was the chain had a tendency to come off a lot. To get the most out of the battery they suggest that you pedal for 30 seconds, then use the motor for 30 seconds, then back to the pedals and so on.
Absolutely zero safety rating though.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30.
|