08-02-2005, 15:53
|
#1
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,604
|
Congestion charges?
With London planning to extend their Congestion charge zone and other towns and cities looking at the idea. My question is..... do you think its right to have to pay to drive into town and city centres?
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:01
|
#2
|
|
That damn leprechaun!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 36
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,200
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Nope. I understand why they've done it in London but I don't see why we should get charged to drive through when we still haven't got a reliable public transport system - there are still problems with delays / cancellations on the rail network and most buses these days are just plain knackered.
Once they get that sorted, then fair enough. Having said that, me and Mrs Nug are off to London next month, but we're going by train ('cos the hotel's about 200 yards from the nearest Tube station), so that's 5 quid they've lost already
EDIT: Just to clarify - I have no problems with congestion charges per se, but I feel that they should get the alternatives to taking your car everywhere sorted first  . I've voted 'no' in the poll but, ideally, I should say 'Not at the moment'
__________________
The doctor told me that BOTH my eyes were lazy! And that's why it was the best summer ever.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:04
|
#3
|
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sarf east Luhndun.
Services: Virgin for TV, BT for phone and Be* for Broadband.
Posts: 24,234
|
Re: Congestion charges?
I have put Yes, but I'd like to qualify that. The money generated should be ringfenced for use on improving public transport, or improving the roads (which should benefit public transport anyway)
__________________
Just to make it clear if a post is bold and is from a team member, it's a moderating decision. If it's not bold or not from a team member, it's not.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:04
|
#4
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 49
Services: VM Phone : Sky+ Multiroom : VM Cable (50 Mbps)
Posts: 18,300
|
Re: Congestion charges?
No, No, No.
It's nothing more than another con and tax on motorists - as if we don't pay enough already.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:07
|
#5
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,604
|
Re: Congestion charges?
But hasn't it reduced traffic in central London by 15%?!? which surely was the aim of the scheme?!?
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:08
|
#6
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 49
Services: VM Phone : Sky+ Multiroom : VM Cable (50 Mbps)
Posts: 18,300
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham F
But hasn't it reduced traffic in central London by 15%?!? which surely was the aim of the scheme?!?
|
Sorry but I think the aim was to make money. A reduction is just a side effect.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:10
|
#7
|
|
[NTHW] pc clan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 44
Services: Be*Pro ADSL2+
Posts: 19,172
|
Re: Congestion charges?
oooooh.....a whole 15%?
__________________
Step by step, walk the thousand mile road...
-----------------------------------------------------
nthwgaming.co.uk
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:11
|
#8
|
|
No Technical Questions
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LCFC Blue Army!
Services: V + HD
V Telephone
V Cable 20MB
Posts: 2,530
|
Re: Congestion charges?
If it reduces my car tax, I'm all for it as I never have to go into the town centre where I guess these charges will be.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:12
|
#9
|
|
That damn leprechaun!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 36
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,200
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skunk4u
If it reduces my car tax, I'm all for it as I never have to go into the town centre where I guess these charges will be.
|
How would it reduce your car tax?
__________________
The doctor told me that BOTH my eyes were lazy! And that's why it was the best summer ever.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:16
|
#10
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,604
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Not really, the object for London was to make the centre of the city move, rather than the gridlock which it had, all the money made in London is being put back into public transport which is good
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:21
|
#11
|
|
That damn leprechaun!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 36
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,200
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham F
Not really, the object for London was to make the centre of the city move, rather than the gridlock which it had, all the money made in London is being put back into public transport which is good 
|
That is a good thing, but I just think that they've done it the wrong way. The public transport system should have been improved first, and then impose the congestion charge - why should people leave their cars at home if they then can't guarantee that their bus or train is going to be on time (or, in some circumstances, even turn up at all)?
__________________
The doctor told me that BOTH my eyes were lazy! And that's why it was the best summer ever.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:22
|
#12
|
|
No Technical Questions
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LCFC Blue Army!
Services: V + HD
V Telephone
V Cable 20MB
Posts: 2,530
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nugget
How would it reduce your car tax?
|
fair enougth cannot answer that after much  .
But surley it would improve roads etc.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:24
|
#13
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,604
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
oooooh.....a whole 15%? 
|
you don't think that is a very big reduction then? I think 15% is a big reduction
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:26
|
#14
|
|
That damn leprechaun!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 36
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,200
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skunk4u
fair enougth cannot answer that after much  .
But surley it would improve roads etc.
|
Well, as Graham F said, the idea is for the money to go back into improving public transport, not sorting the roads out.
I s'pose that, technically, you may see an improvement in the roads because of the reduction of the traffic using them, but the charge isn't actually being levied to do this specifically
__________________
The doctor told me that BOTH my eyes were lazy! And that's why it was the best summer ever.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 16:28
|
#15
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 36
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,772
|
Re: Congestion charges?
Lets see - well, my wages are taxed at 22% or there abouts - my car is taxed at 180 odd quid a year, the petrol i use to drive around is taxed at something like 70% and now they want me to pay to drive through certain areas.
The swear filter prohibits me from telling them where they should go.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36.
|