Benefits for striking low-paid workers to be axed

[mertle]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-18476504

absolute shocking piece criminal act by the parasites in power. No wonder human rights is wanted to be teared up by these yobs in suits.

Are we now effectively have oppresive regime no different to those we condemn.

We defacto now moving very close in state where fear to speak and stand up against what we believe is wrong. Especially with the spying rubbish planned.

Whats next in line snatch squads who raises there voice against oppresive regime. We seem to be excelerating to turn us into 1930's germany or 1950 eastern bloc.

cameron and your rich parasites budies

[djfunkdup]

Gawd you don't half talk a load of pish

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by djfunkdup

Gawd you don't half talk a load of pish

Seconded

[mertle]

well read it this is oppresive move pillocks.

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by mertle

[URL]

Whats next in line snatch squads who raises there voice against oppresive regime. We seem to be excelerating to turn us into 1930's germany or 1950 eastern bloc.

cameron and your rich parasites budies

You really do live in cloud cuckoo land.

---------- Post added at 11:46 ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 ----------

Originally Posted by mertle

well read it this is oppresive move pillocks.

So when someone does not like what you say you resort to abuse. Act like a grown up if you want to debate grown up matters.

[denphone]

Oh dear not another anti thread.

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by denphone

Oh dear not another anti thread.

Yep time for an addition to my list of those who's posts i cannot see

[gazzae]

Originally Posted by mertle

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-18476504

absolute shocking piece criminal act by the parasites in power. No wonder human rights is wanted to be teared up by these yobs in suits.

Are we now effectively have oppresive regime no different to those we condemn.

We defacto now moving very close in state where fear to speak and stand up against what we believe is wrong. Especially with the spying rubbish planned.

Whats next in line snatch squads who raises there voice against oppresive regime. We seem to be excelerating to turn us into 1930's germany or 1950 eastern bloc.

cameron and your rich parasites budies

Why should someone on £13,000 a year be able to go on strike and lose no money?

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by mertle

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-18476504

absolute shocking piece criminal act by the parasites in power. No wonder human rights is wanted to be teared up by these yobs in suits.

Are we now effectively have oppresive regime no different to those we condemn.

We defacto now moving very close in state where fear to speak and stand up against what we believe is wrong. Especially with the spying rubbish planned.

Whats next in line snatch squads who raises there voice against oppresive regime. We seem to be excelerating to turn us into 1930's germany or 1950 eastern bloc.

cameron and your rich parasites budies

So you think its right that someone should NOT have there WORKING tax credits removed when they are on STRIKE and NOT WORKING

[mertle]

Originally Posted by Sirius

You really do live in cloud cuckoo land.

well how far do you think it will go then clever cloggs

did you think they would deny people right to strike by telling they would lose there homes.

clearly more policies we get its move to oppress us.

let them take more rights away while you and others stick head in sand say it wont effect us dont care atitude.

Not one these policies help solve the mess but very much there dogma to crush peoples rights.

They had ago disabled, unemployed, low paid workers, public sector.

When they come knocking something effect you maybe you will scream and moan.

[Rob]

Striking should be a measure of last resort in a dispute with an employer. Just as the employer has hardship by having no staff so looses business, so should those on strike suffer hardship. That encourages both sides back to the negotiating table as both are incentivised.

Frankly I'm gobsmacked to realise that those on strike weren't getting hit in the pocket. To find that the taxpayer is effectively subsidising strikes is just wrong. I had always thought unions had strike funds which were paying our something back to their authorised strikers. To realise that it's easy for people to strike knowing that they have little financial risk is all wrong.

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by myrtle

well how far do you think it will go then clever clogs

did you think they would deny people right to strike by telling they would lose there homes.

clearly more policies we get its move to oppress us.

let them take more rights away while you and others stick head in sand say it wont effect us don't care attitude.

Not one these policies help solve the mess but very much there dogma to crush peoples rights.

They had ago disabled, unemployed, low paid workers, public sector.

When they come knocking something effect you maybe you will scream and moan.

Half of what you have just posted is pure rantings of a person who hates the latest Government, I don't think you would be posting half of this rubbish if the Government was Labour. I did not see you posting when they destroyed this country with there stupid spend spend spend policies or there sending young men in to a war on a lie, Where were you then ??????

All i see in your posts is a massive anti Tory bias with very little proof to back up your claims. You have been pulled many times for you inaccurate quoting and ranting to the point where i don't believe a word you post any more.

---------- Post added at 12:02 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

Originally Posted by Rob

Frankly I'm gobsmacked to realise that those on strike weren't getting hit in the pocket. To find that the taxpayer is effectively subsidising strikes is just wrong. I had always thought unions had strike funds which were paying our something back to their authorised strikers. To realise that it's easy for people to strike knowing that they have little financial risk is all wrong.

[mertle]

Originally Posted by Sirius

So you think its right that someone should NOT have there WORKING tax credits removed when they are on STRIKE and NOT WORKING

So you think striking should be privilage to those who on significant funds that require no tax credits. What selfish atitude you have.

It should be every workers right if they been treated badly by owners to ballot and strike.

Now admit some strikes seem stupid those need eradicating but surely when there clear issue that right should not effect losing those benefits which would effect losing there home.

So many heartless tory yobs on this forum it seems.

What now to stop a company pay many more on low minimum wage knowing they wont strike.

[dilligaf1701]

Nope, don't get it - why should people get benefits while not working through their own choice?

[martyh]

As far as i was aware strikers are not entitled to any other benefits which is where the strike fund operated by some unions comes in (example; the miners strike)also being on strike is a voluntary act in the same category of leaving a job voluntarily which would also remove entitlement to benefits