Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
02-03-2010, 22:21
|
#76
|
|
Flyboy
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,372
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
just me disagreeing with unions donating to the labour party ,should be illegal ,something i feel very strong about
individuals can no problem it's their choice ,but when some militant numpty with a power complex decides what members money should be spent on for them i get a tad irate
|
No you weren't, you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
whether they want to or not
|
In response to:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
I don't see why the unions' donations are relevant here. It is not the unions who are donating the money, it is the members.
|
If it should be illegal for unions to donate money to a political party, then it should be illegal for all single interest groups to donate money. Or is it that they donate money to the Labour party?
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:24
|
#77
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: europe
Age: 51
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: 1,654
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek S
|
Just a point to note a union member can opt out of the political levy if they so wish,certainly the union i am in will furnish a form for you to do so.
__________________
Money does not buy you happiness,but at least you
can be miserable in comfort-spike milligan.
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:28
|
#78
|
|
Prudence my arse
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington or in a world of pain killers
Services: 3 x Tivo 1 x V+, 1 Phone, Broadband, 100 meg so stick that up your pipe Sky :)
Posts: 8,928
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
I don't see why the unions' donations are relevant here. It is not the unions who are donating the money, it is the members.
|
Do the unions have any say in the polices of Labour or in the choice of there leader ??
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:28
|
#79
|
|
Flyboy
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,372
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Aaaw, Richard....you went and spilled the beans.
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:29
|
#80
|
|
Prudence my arse
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington or in a world of pain killers
Services: 3 x Tivo 1 x V+, 1 Phone, Broadband, 100 meg so stick that up your pipe Sky :)
Posts: 8,928
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
No you weren't, you said:
In response to:
If it should be illegal for unions to donate money to a political party, then it should be illegal for all single interest groups to donate money. Or is it that they donate money to the Labour party?
|
I have left the cwu because i did not want my subscriptions used to fund the labour party.
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:30
|
#81
|
|
Flyboy
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,372
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Do the unions have any say in the polices of Labour or in the choice of there leader ??
|
Only to the extent of what their members tell them to do.
---------- Post added at 21:30 ---------- Previous post was at 21:29 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
I left the cwu because i did not want my subscriptions used to fund the labour party.
|
But you didn't have to leave the union to do that. So, I suspect you either didn't really leave the union, or that you left for a different reason.
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:31
|
#82
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Age: 47
Services: crappy sky+ tv
crappy BT internet and phone
still got my VM mobile
Posts: 7,902
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
No you weren't, you said:
In response to:
If it should be illegal for unions to donate money to a political party, then it should be illegal for all single interest groups to donate money. Or is it that they donate money to the Labour party?
|
yes that's right ,in response to it is the members ,i said whether they want to or not ,hinting at the lack of choice for union members
do try to keep up
and since you raise the subject a single interest group would have members only interested in a single purpose so no problem ,but i wouldn't call a trade union a single interest group ,it's members can follow any political offiliation
__________________
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life."
Terry Pratchett, Jingo
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:31
|
#83
|
|
Prudence my arse
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington or in a world of pain killers
Services: 3 x Tivo 1 x V+, 1 Phone, Broadband, 100 meg so stick that up your pipe Sky :)
Posts: 8,928
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard1960
Just a point to note a union member can opt out of the political levy if they so wish,certainly the union i am in will furnish a form for you to do so.
|
Unfortunatly i could not trust the CWU to do that.
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:31
|
#84
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB
V+ STB
Posts: 1,691
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
The Unions are allowed to kick you out if you don't agree with their aims/beliefs.
How do you think that the Trade Union would treat you, if you didn't donate to the Labour Party?
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:35
|
#85
|
|
Flyboy
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,372
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Unfortunatly i could not trust the CWU to do that.
|
Oh come on, are you seriously trying to tell us that your thirty pence a week was in danger of being passed on to the Labour party? Do you think that they would reduce your dues and segregate the remaining amount, just so they could levy your subscription to the Labour party. I think you need a new tinfoil hat, the one you are using is starting wear out.
---------- Post added at 21:35 ---------- Previous post was at 21:34 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
The Unions are allowed to kick you out if you don't agree with their aims/beliefs.
How do you think that the Trade Union would treat you, if you didn't donate to the Labour Party?
|
I have not heard of a union singling out members, who have opted out of the political levy, for special treatment. I don't suppose you have any examples you could show us, do you?
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:36
|
#86
|
|
Prudence my arse
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington or in a world of pain killers
Services: 3 x Tivo 1 x V+, 1 Phone, Broadband, 100 meg so stick that up your pipe Sky :)
Posts: 8,928
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
Only to the extent of what their members tell them to do.
---------- Post added at 21:30 ---------- Previous post was at 21:29 ----------
But you didn't have to leave the union to do that. So, I suspect you either didn't really leave the union, or that you left for a different reason.
|
Quote:
Yet if the unions of today are a shadow of what they once were, their influence in the Labour party remains in some key respects greater than ever. Today's union leaders are not the household figures that Jones and his contemporaries were. But a core of five powerful union bosses today – Unite's Tony Woodley and Derek Simpson, Unison's Dave Prentis, the GMB's Paul Kenny and Usdaw's John Hannett – continue to bankroll the party and to deploy immense influence in its leadership elections. Their influence is widely underestimated – except by those who are set on capturing the party after its expected general election defeat.
Between them, these five donated more than £8m of the £9.2m that the unions as a whole donated to Labour last year. When the general election comes, it is to them that Labour will turn again with offers of favours in return for money. While they are weaker than ever in the world at large, the unions also retain a constitutional centrality in the election of Labour's leader. Today Labour has only 2.6 million affiliated union members against more than 6 million in the 1980s. But they still *command a third of the electoral college which chooses Labour's leader as if their former power was undiminished.
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...eunions-labour
Seems to me if they have that sort of power then there funding is of merit and should be considered.
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:40
|
#87
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB
V+ STB
Posts: 1,691
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
There have been cases of people being kicked out because they expressly didn't support the Labour Party.
How would anyone really be sure that they were getting the full support from the union. Has any non-Labour supporter made it anywhere within the union organisation?
They sponsor individual MPs(Labour of course). What do they expect in return for that support?
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:40
|
#88
|
|
Prudence my arse
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington or in a world of pain killers
Services: 3 x Tivo 1 x V+, 1 Phone, Broadband, 100 meg so stick that up your pipe Sky :)
Posts: 8,928
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
Oh come on, are you seriously trying to tell us that your thirty pence a week was in danger of being passed on to the Labour party? Do you think that they would reduce your dues and segregate the remaining amount, just so they could levy your subscription to the Labour party. I think you need a new tinfoil hat, the one you are using is starting wear out.[COLOR="Silver"]
|
No i just do not want ANY amount of my money to be used by the Labour party its as simple as that. No tin foil hat needed to work that out, There again you only see what you want to see and hear what you want to hear. http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:40
|
#89
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Age: 47
Services: crappy sky+ tv
crappy BT internet and phone
still got my VM mobile
Posts: 7,902
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
[QUOTE=Flyboy;34973584]Oh come on, are you seriously trying to tell us that your thirty pence a week was in danger of being passed on to the Labour party? Do you think that they would reduce your dues and segregate the remaining amount, just so they could levy your subscription to the Labour party. I think you need a new tinfoil hat, the one you are using is starting wear out.
actually the levy is ADDED to the normal dues and a member has to opt in if he wants to pay them ,my argument is that i don't trust unions to ONLY use the EXTRA levy for donations
__________________
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life."
Terry Pratchett, Jingo
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:48
|
#90
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,666
|
Re: Will we ever get to the truth about Ashcroft's tax status
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
You may find this of interest, then...
|
Some good info there, thanks.
I see that the Sainsbury family have both sides covered they donate millions to Labour and the Conservatives every year.
A total of £13,486,964.00 from mid 2004 up to the end of 2009. So that's why they were made Lords?
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16.
|