Boris And The Liberal Hypocrites

[trevortt]

There are few things more sickening than the hypocrisy of establishment politicians that attack the BNP as racist for defending the interests of the indigenous White British people, and yet who celebrate and applaud those of other racial groups for doing the exact same thing that the BNP wish to do.

Today Boris Johnson has revealed that he intends to be as much an idiot and hypocrite as Red Ken was.

Mr Johnson, elected on Friday, announced the appointment of Ray Lewis, an inspirational black community leader, as a deputy mayor with a key role in tackling youth violence. Mr Lewis, a former prison governor, runs a successful Black only school for troubled black youths, which he predicts will educate Britain’s first black prime minister.

Mr Lewis founded the Eastside Young Leaders’ Academy, which provides disruptive black youngsters with a combination of military-style discipline and a traditional education including poetry and the classics. It says that all pupils gain at least two A-levels and three quarters go to university.

Yet when the BNP support the idea of White British children only schools we are called racist for doing so, even though White British children are the worst performing ethnic group in the educational system.

Read the full article here

Why is that schools run for Asian, Muslims, Jews, Sikhs and Hindus exist across the country but not one school exists for White indigenous children ?

Why is that the White indigenous children, who are the lowest performing ethnic groups in schools, are not having government funds targeted for their assistance - but money is still being targeted at raising the educational standards of other ethnic groups who are performing better than white children ?

Why cant the BNP set up a network of White indigenous schools across the UK which teach traditional British Christianity or the ancestral religions of the British folk such as Odinism and Druidism ?

The answer is simply that they want our children to fail, as thereby the failures of others can be made to appear as success.

[Maggy J]

Coggy gets out the deckchair,popcorn and a big mug of tea......

[Jonnymeg]

Originally Posted by trevortt

Read the full article here

Why is that schools run for Asian, Muslims, Jews, Sikhs and Hindus exist across the country but not one school exists for White indigenous children ?

Why cant the BNP set up a network of White indigenous schools across the UK which teach traditional British Christianity or the ancestral religions of the British folk such as Odinism and Druidism ?

I agree.

i have often thought that there are too many groups, events or bodies dedicated to blacks, asians or other nationalities. If there were ones soley for the whites then i am sure there would be trouble.

[papa smurf]

Muslims, Jews, Sikhs and Hindus are religious groups and are not color specific as far as i know, ..my sons went to a church school c of E...but that school had a fair percentage of other religious groups in it ,not sure its legal to be colour specific[what ever color] thats discrimination i believe.

[Xaccers]

Trevor, please provide the evidence that this organisation is doing exactly what the BNP do.
Last time I checked, Ray Lewis doesn't claim that you have to be a certain colour to be British, nor for non-blacks to be ejected from their country of birth.
Maybe I'm wrong, please do provide the evidence, or is it as mythical as the Asian BNP MP's?

[foreverwar]

Originally Posted by trevortt

Read the full article here

Why is that schools run for Asian, Muslims, Jews, Sikhs and Hindus exist across the country but not one school exists for White indigenous children ?

I think you will find, trevorino, that if you go to a large number of schools in small towns and villages, it would be unusual to find a non-white face in a lot of them. And as another poster pointed out, you can have white Jews, white Muslims, and Parsees are very light-skinned, and often mistaken for Europeans.

btw, you state twice "white indigenous", that is, a qualified noun - does that mean you agree there can be non-white indigenes? (Otherwise, you would have just stated "indigenous" - unless you just get a thrill out of typing the word "white"?).

Originally Posted by trevortt

Why is that the White indigenous children, who are the lowest performing ethnic groups in schools, are not having government funds targeted for their assistance - but money is still being targeted at raising the educational standards of other ethnic groups who are performing better than white children ?

You (and your friends in the BNP) are very selective with your statistics, aren't you?

The figures for 5 A-C grades at GCSE Telegraph
Poor working-class white boys 17%
Poor working-class black boys 19%

Not a lot of difference, and it is a subset of boys, not all children; but then, bringing facts into a discussion, rather than twisting them to suit your purpose, wouldn't really further your purpose, would it?

btw, you forgot these figures -
Black boys are six times more likely to be excluded from school than their white counterparts
The Black population of England is 4.6%, yet the percentage of black prisoners is almost 17%. Meanwhile, black students account for just 3% of undergraduates

Update - found the latest DFES figures, which seem to contradict trev's/BNP's assertions Link

the Statistical First Release shows the percentage of pupils achieving 5 or more A* to C grades at GCSE and equivalent:
• White: up 2.8 percentage points to 55.1 per cent
• Black Caribbean: up 6 percentage points to 41.7 per cent.
• Black African: up 5 percentage points to 48.3 per cent.
• Indian: up 3.5 percentage points to 70.1 per cent
• Pakistani: up 3.2 percentage points to 48.4 per cent
• Bangladeshi: up 4.3 percentage points to 52.7 per cent
• Chinese: up 6.8 percentage points from 74.2 in 2004 to 81.0 percent in 2005, performing considerably higher than any other group

Originally Posted by trevortt

Why cant the BNP set up a network of White indigenous schools across the UK which teach traditional British Christianity or the ancestral religions of the British folk such as Odinism and Druidism ?

Damn, there goes another pair of underpants - "Odinism and Druidism"; nice to see forward thinking on behalf of the BNP - what next - teaching flat-earthism and "Earth is the centre of the Universe" in Science?
btw (and this may make your head explode, so sorry), "traditional British Christianity" has its foundations in the Middle East (you know, where those olive-skinned people live), and then was promulgated by the Roman Empire (from Italy, where they are also olive-skinned)

Originally Posted by trevortt

The answer is simply that they want our children to fail, as thereby the failures of others can be made to appear as success.

When people start quoting "they", it is only a small step until the issue of the nice waistcoat that straps up the back........

[homealone]

I think he meant onanism not Odinism

[XFS03]

It wasn't until the Lee Jasper fiasco came to light, that I realised how many "black only" organisations existed in London. Among these were a business advice centre, women's refuge, youth club etc.

I cannot understand how these groups are allowed to get away with blatent racial disrimination. Could you imagine the outcry if the above organisations were preceded with "white" instead of "Black".

[Xaccers]

Originally Posted by XFS03

It wasn't until the Lee Jasper fiasco came to light, that I realised how many "black only" organisations existed in London. Among these were a business advice centre, women's refuge, youth club etc.

I cannot understand how these groups are allowed to get away with blatent racial disrimination. Could you imagine the outcry if the above organisations were preceded with "white" instead of "Black".

You do realise you're saying the equivalent of "Women's refuges for beaten women should allow men to enter them because otherwise it's sexist" don't you?

[frogstamper]

Originally Posted by XFS03

It wasn't until the Lee Jasper fiasco came to light, that I realised how many "black only" organisations existed in London. Among these were a business advice centre, women's refuge, youth club etc.

I cannot understand how these groups are allowed to get away with blatent racial disrimination. Could you imagine the outcry if the above organisations were preceded with "white" instead of "Black".

You mention "black only" organisations in London, if they really are "black only" post who they are, I doubt very much that they are "black only" along the lines of the BNPs "white only" policy. If for example one organisation is for youngsters who have been in trouble with the police, and just so happens to be all black because of the location, is that any worse than a similar group say out in the sticks which happens to be all white because of its location? I imagine a lot of these cases are down to just that, a particular area which is either majority black or white.


PS Doesn't trev just love these BNP stories, I wonder whats next, how about the Queen being forced to convert to Islam by those nasty moslims.

[RizzyKing]

There are a lot of race specific groups around and yes i think it is wrong as well. As to the point of women's refuge's for domestic violence allowing men in thats a bit of a stupid comparison. But an interesting point would be anyone know where a refuge is for battered husbands ??. Welcome to modern britain where we try to be so all inclusive we are sod all use to anyone in reality but it looks good and thats what matters.

[Xaccers]

Originally Posted by RizzyKing

There are a lot of race specific groups around and yes i think it is wrong as well. As to the point of women's refuge's for domestic violence allowing men in thats a bit of a stupid comparison. But an interesting point would be anyone know where a refuge is for battered husbands ??. Welcome to modern britain where we try to be so all inclusive we are sod all use to anyone in reality but it looks good and thats what matters.

Yes there are refuges for male victims of domestic violence.

The BNP are not called racist because of their support for "indiginous caucasians" it's for their racist attitude towards non-indiginous caucasians, stating that someone born here who isn't caucasian should have fewer rights than someone who was born here but is caucasian.

Not providing a service for all members of society isn't racist, stating that people of another colour should not have any access to services is.
It's something which is obviously too complicated for the BNP and their followers to understand, hence their attempt at using the girl guides to claim they are not racist.

[Russ B]

Originally Posted by trevortt

Why cant the BNP set up a network of White indigenous schools across the UK which teach traditional British Christianity or the ancestral religions of the British folk such as Odinism and Druidism ?

I'm sure there was a study last year which said most parents don't want religion to be taught in schools. Kind of makes your point moot unless your agenda is one of "we want what they get - just out of principle even though what we'd get isn't really wanted".

[Stuart C]

Originally Posted by trevortt

or the ancestral religions of the British folk such as Odinism and Druidism ?

Interesting.. I had to look Odinism up, as I wasn't sure of the meaning, but according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_neopaganism it is a form of Germanic Paganism.

So, you are seriously suggesting you want White British Children to be free to follow the practices of a German religion that worships a Norse God?

Oh, and according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germani...ganism#Odinism , the oldest Odinist group in this country was founded in the, err, 1970s. So, hardly ancestral.

[Mr_love_monkey]

I've got my own one eyed god that I worship. (as do many women)

Say no more..