Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Quick Question? Expected Speeds


You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Services

Quick Question? Expected Speeds
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16-05-2008, 09:53   #16
Tech Support
 
whydoIneedatech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Knowsley
Services: VIRGIN MEDIA , 20 Mb BB, V+ Box, XL Phone and 3 Virgin Mobiles
Posts: 947
whydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to allwhydoIneedatech is a name known to all
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by whydoIneedatech View Post
My Speed is fine just checked it.

I posted the above for a laugh because it said I was on nearly 21Mb, its genuine but how accurate?

I really could not care as long as I have a connection.
__________________
The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back!
whydoIneedatech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 14:18   #17
cf.member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
_wtf_ is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
What ever happened to just doing what you need to do and if it happens as fast as you need it to being happy.
I work from home, send and receive large files around the world as and when required. So 30-45 mins to download check make changes and re-upload another 30-45 mins, is a bit of a deal to me.
_wtf_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 15:18   #18
Dipper of Chickens
 
chickendippers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wirral
Services: VIP
Posts: 659
chickendippers has a spectacular aura about themchickendippers has a spectacular aura about themchickendippers has a spectacular aura about themchickendippers has a spectacular aura about them
Send a message via ICQ to chickendippers Send a message via AIM to chickendippers Send a message via MSN to chickendippers Send a message via Yahoo to chickendippers
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by _wtf_ View Post
I work from home, send and receive large files around the world as and when required. So 30-45 mins to download check make changes and re-upload another 30-45 mins, is a bit of a deal to me.
Shouldn't you be on business broadband then?
__________________
Valcato Hosting - 6 years in the business

A plan to suit everyone - Starting at £20/year and £3/month
chickendippers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 15:37   #19
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a pretty place where the flowers grow.
Services: 25/25 Symetrical.
Posts: 1,662
TraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by chickendippers View Post
Shouldn't you be on business broadband then?
Just for wanting a decent upload speed?
TraxData is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 15:49   #20
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bath
Services: 4Mb VM Broadband
Posts: 674
ceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via Yahoo to ceedee
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by _wtf_ View Post
I work from home, send and receive large files around the world as and when required. So 30-45 mins to download check make changes and re-upload another 30-45 mins, is a bit of a deal to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickendippers View Post
Shouldn't you be on business broadband then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TraxData View Post
Just for wanting a decent upload speed?
Doesn't _wtf_ want to be able to upload and download large files whenever s/he needs to, regardless of any local or network congestion?
Sounds to me like the solution is a leased or managed line, whatever connection speed is required...
ceedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 16:01   #21
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a pretty place where the flowers grow.
Services: 25/25 Symetrical.
Posts: 1,662
TraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedee View Post
Doesn't _wtf_ want to be able to upload and download large files whenever s/he needs to, regardless of any local or network congestion?
Sounds to me like the solution is a leased or managed line, whatever connection speed is required...
Be offer 2.5mbit upload...which is enough for uploading large files...

Are you trying to say people uploading/downloading large files cause network congestion? you couldnt be more wrong...
TraxData is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 17:55   #22
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bath
Services: 4Mb VM Broadband
Posts: 674
ceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via Yahoo to ceedee
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by TraxData View Post
Be offer 2.5mbit upload...which is enough for uploading large files...
... until "large" = "huge by today's standards" or BeThere find they can't afford to expand fast enough and have to introduce STM too.

Quote:
Are you trying to say people uploading/downloading large files cause network congestion? you couldnt be more wrong...
Of course not. Read it again?
There's little point in you trying to find something critical of you in every post -- if I'd wanted to flag up that _wtf_ hadn't groaned about slow upload speeds or that s/he's actions were causing the congestion, that's exactly what I'd have written.
ceedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 17:58   #23
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a pretty place where the flowers grow.
Services: 25/25 Symetrical.
Posts: 1,662
TraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedee View Post
... until "large" = "huge by today's standards" or BeThere find they can't afford to expand fast enough and have to introduce STM too.


Of course not. Read it again?
There's little point in you trying to find something critical of you in every post -- if I'd wanted to flag up that _wtf_ hadn't groaned about slow upload speeds or that s/he's actions were causing the congestion, that's exactly what I'd have written.
Not everyone is like VM you know, some isp's actually upgrade their hardware/infrastructure when its needed to provide the user with what they are paying for.

Be wont implement STM.
TraxData is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 18:40   #24
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bath
Services: 4Mb VM Broadband
Posts: 674
ceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of lightceedee is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via Yahoo to ceedee
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by TraxData View Post
Not everyone is like VM you know, some isp's actually upgrade their hardware/infrastructure when its needed to provide the user with what they are paying for.
If Be continue (almost) doubling their user base in a quarter, I'd guess that sooner or later they'll hit capacity problems.

Quote:
Be wont implement STM.
I'm relieved that you're so certain.
However Be's parent have a far from admirable track record.
(O2 missed the 3G rollout condition by four months and denied deliberately traffic managing 3G speeds until caught red-handed.)

Isn't it primarily about access to investment funds for very low marginal rates of return or, in VM's case, the lack of access due to unprofitability?
ceedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 22:04   #25
cf.member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 18
leadbelly is on a distinguished roadleadbelly is on a distinguished road
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by _wtf_ View Post
I'm getting the same as sam-1990 so why the hell am I paying £37 per month when I'm only getting 5Mb/s

sigh

it always makes me wonder you know.... why can places like japan manage to provide 100mbit connection speeds for all these years -- not just download i might add, but upload speed as well -- and yet, in this country we're getting absolutely raped with much lower connection speeds for higher prices, and to make it worse, they completely fail to provide those speeds anyway?

100mbit in japan is dirt cheap. it's not even the fastest connection you can get there. in certain places you are able to get 1gig connection speeds.

if in some countries they're able to provide 1gig connection speeds at affordable prices, why oh why are virgin media unable to provide a mere 20mb without capping the hell out of us?

anyone remember this?

http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=32304

what has happened to this company since then?

edit:

i just had to quote this part.

Quote:
In partnership with Arris and BitTorrent the trial will take place in Ashford, Kent. The 100Mb speed will be 10 times the highest speed offered by NTL at the moment.
oh god... that made me laugh.

Last edited by leadbelly; 16-05-2008 at 22:08.
leadbelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 23:41   #26
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a pretty place where the flowers grow.
Services: 25/25 Symetrical.
Posts: 1,662
TraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond reputeTraxData has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Quick Question? Expected Speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by leadbelly View Post
sigh

it always makes me wonder you know.... why can places like japan manage to provide 100mbit connection speeds for all these years -- not just download i might add, but upload speed as well -- and yet, in this country we're getting absolutely raped with much lower connection speeds for higher prices, and to make it worse, they completely fail to provide those speeds anyway?

100mbit in japan is dirt cheap. it's not even the fastest connection you can get there. in certain places you are able to get 1gig connection speeds.

if in some countries they're able to provide 1gig connection speeds at affordable prices, why oh why are virgin media unable to provide a mere 20mb without capping the hell out of us?

anyone remember this?

http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=32304

what has happened to this company since then?

edit:

i just had to quote this part.



oh god... that made me laugh.
The 100mbit trial was a complete failure, no one could reach 100...max anyone reached was 80 and it almost brought everyone else to a halt LOL.

To be fair, it's only VM that is ripping us off in the Uk for the most part, ADSL/ADSL+2 really cant offer high upload speeds, Be got it right with offering 2.5mbit through adsl+2

VM have a major advantage...they could do so many things and be very leading edge, but that requires them to pay for upgrades on the network, which, as you know with NTL/VM isnt likely to happen.

They are upgrading the backhaul links to 40Gbit from 10Gbit (yes, most of the network is still only 10)...now when we were just about to get 20Mbit...that would of been great...but for what they are doing now they really need 100Gbit link ups, but it isnt going to happen, which is why once 50mbit really kicks off with alot of people on it...it will go down the STM route as well.

Of course, as you know, they are going to offer a poor upload on that tier as well (current 1.5mbit, rummoured that it may go to 2.5mbit)

They had 6mbit upload at the start of the trials (which let's face it, although good for VM it should of been at least 50/10 to be a fair ratio)

But they scrapped the modems they was using for the -ALOT- cheaper ones..which unfortunetly for the customers have no upstream bonding, which is why its dropped down to 1.5mbit.

Take a wild guess on who's idea it was to just buy the cheaper modems rather than give customers what they are actually asking for.

Unfortunetly for VM (and this has even been noted by alex) they are realising that information is coming out and people are not happy with such low upload speeds, they are slowly learning that people want around 5mbit upload minimum for such a premium product.

This is going to leave VM in a tricky situation...but not one they cant get out of because 20mbit everyone wanted 1.5mbit upload...(which ironically, was the plan then they cut it at the last minute, good old VM) but we got just enough to max the downstream out and that's that.

With VM's track record you really cant expect any sort of powerful upload imo.

And there is some ISP's that offer great down/up if you live in the right area you can get 25mbit symetrical (both ways) for £50/month.

Then there is the H2o network which if successful could easily run VM into the ground.

So, it's not all that bad.
TraxData is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:21.


Links
Google
 
Web www.cableforum.co.uk


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Cable Forum.
(s204569790.onlinehome.info)