Anyone on the 20mbit/s yet?

[huyi]

Originally Posted by vmtec

Wed, 2 May 2007 19:12:18 UTC

1st 512K took 14 ms = 36571.4 KB/sec, approx 301348 Kbps, 294.29 Mbps
2nd 512K took 15 ms = 34133.3 KB/sec, approx 281258 Kbps, 274.67 Mbps
3rd 512K took 14 ms = 36571.4 KB/sec, approx 301348 Kbps, 294.29 Mbps
4th 512K took 13 ms = 39384.6 KB/sec, approx 324529 Kbps, 316.92 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 302121 Kbps, 295.04 Mbps

lol

[popper]

Originally Posted by Sirpingalot

Modem config still states 10mbit/s. What I'm asking you is; is my connection on the brink of failing, seing as my downstream power level is -10.6 dBmV, and my SNR is 30.5 dB?

i think theres more upto date info somewere ?,but this might help answer your question, you say your on 64QAM so keep that in mind below.
"
What Should The Power Levels Be?

Typical values for each (this should not be confused with the levels the ntl: technicians can see from their end, as they use a different measurement system) are:
Note the Downstream power levels are determined by a QAM setting on the network. Increasingly this is 256QAM on ntl: nd Telewest, and can be determined when obtaining these power level readings.

Downstream Power (64QAM - being phased out) +5 to -15 dBmV with the ideal being close to 0. Values outside of this range would normally result in either an inability to lock onto the network signal, or frequent disconnections.

Downstream Power (256QAM) +15 to -6 dBmV range, but optimal is +10dBmv to 0 dBmv, with the ideal being close to 5. Values outside of this range would normally result in either an inability to lock onto the network signal, or frequent disconnections.

Upstream Power Anywhere from 35db to 58 on a Surfboard, 61 on an ntl: 100. Generally lower values are better. If you constantly see 58 on Surfboard or 60/61 on Ambit/ntl: modem this would indicate a poor upstream path and probably result in frequent disconnections.

Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) For 64QAM downstream, a figure above 25 is desirable, above 30 is ideal. For 256QAM downstream a figure above 30 is desirable, above 33 is ideal A low SNR is usually the cause of very slow browsing and high packet loss.

There are no adjustments that can be made at the user end to improve any of these values. If any values fall outside the desired ranges and cause the service to fail, the problem can only be rectified by an engineer from ntl: adjusting the levels.

With this in mind a call should be made to ntl: Technical Support. Please note the key line above and cause the service to fail, some modems will run for months on a 58 upstream power level, or a 24 SNR, if the values are outside the above ranges but the service is running OK then leave things be. If it's not broke don't fix it."
http://www.chetnet.co.uk/articles/in...x_v2&id=42&c=7

[Wackahack]

Originally Posted by vmtec

Wed, 2 May 2007 19:12:18 UTC

1st 512K took 14 ms = 36571.4 KB/sec, approx 301348 Kbps, 294.29 Mbps
2nd 512K took 15 ms = 34133.3 KB/sec, approx 281258 Kbps, 274.67 Mbps
3rd 512K took 14 ms = 36571.4 KB/sec, approx 301348 Kbps, 294.29 Mbps
4th 512K took 13 ms = 39384.6 KB/sec, approx 324529 Kbps, 316.92 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 302121 Kbps, 295.04 Mbps

I can get that speed too if i want just press refreash on i.e because of the catch

[Sirpingalot]

Cheers, popper

---------- Post added at 21:41 ---------- Previous post was at 21:38 ----------

Wed, 02 May 2007 20:40:28 GMT

1st 512K took 406 ms = 1261.1 KB/sec, approx 10391 Kbps, 10.15 Mbps
2nd 512K took 485 ms = 1055.7 KB/sec, approx 8699 Kbps, 8.5 Mbps
3rd 512K took 609 ms = 840.7 KB/sec, approx 6927 Kbps, 6.76 Mbps
4th 512K took 828 ms = 618.4 KB/sec, approx 5096 Kbps, 4.98 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 7778 Kbps, 7.6 Mbps

[AndrewJ]

ROCHDALE ON 20MB


































not.

[Sirpingalot]

Ach. Stop posting like that. You get me all excited, and then let me down damnit.

Originally Posted by AndrewJ

ROCHDALE ON 20MB




not.

I wish you would bloody well cut that out.

[Sirpingalot]

I've just discovered I'm on the Baguley network. I'm FAR closer to the Liverpool one. Any ideas when Baguley will be upgraded?

[2||Para]

All i can say is it will be there when it is.Sheesh you must have been a nitemare for your parents leading upto Xmas

[marky]

Can you quit posting GOD DAMN speed tests unless you get the upgrade.
Its doing my tree in now

[Sirpingalot]

Originally Posted by 2||Para

All i can say is it will be there when it is.Sheesh you must have been a nitemare for your parents leading upto Xmas

I don't find that even the least bit amusing.

[slowcoach]

Aldershott updated to 20 meg.
Called a friend and told him to check his modem config, 10 meg, rebooted the modem tada....

Now where's mine, bugger all these southern jessie's getting it first, there's going to be a revolution, mark my words, we will only take so much...

[AndrewJ]

Originally Posted by marky

Can you quit posting GOD DAMN speed tests unless you get the upgrade.
Its doing my tree in now

Wed, 02 May 2007 23:16:00 GMT

1st 512K took 453 ms = 1130.2 KB/sec, approx 9313 Kbps, 9.09 Mbps
2nd 512K took 407 ms = 1258 KB/sec, approx 10366 Kbps, 10.12 Mbps
3rd 512K took 453 ms = 1130.2 KB/sec, approx 9313 Kbps, 9.09 Mbps
4th 512K took 437 ms = 1171.6 KB/sec, approx 9654 Kbps, 9.43 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9662 Kbps, 9.43 Mbps

[J.D]

Originally Posted by AndrewJ

Wed, 02 May 2007 23:16:00 GMT

1st 512K took 453 ms = 1130.2 KB/sec, approx 9313 Kbps, 9.09 Mbps
2nd 512K took 407 ms = 1258 KB/sec, approx 10366 Kbps, 10.12 Mbps
3rd 512K took 453 ms = 1130.2 KB/sec, approx 9313 Kbps, 9.09 Mbps
4th 512K took 437 ms = 1171.6 KB/sec, approx 9654 Kbps, 9.43 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9662 Kbps, 9.43 Mbps

You did kinda ask for that Marky .

[RS100]

lol,,,