Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | [Merged] Manchester Ping Probs


You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Services

[Merged] Manchester Ping Probs
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2004, 21:50   #1
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
[Merged] Manchester Ping Probs

As its getting cold and winter like [as it is all year ] ive started UT again, only i cant play on most servers.
So i did a tracert to our server once it was empty and i had nothing else running at all.

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 33 ms 6 ms 14 ms 10.10.112.1
3 26 ms 31 ms 23 ms bagu-t2cam1-b-ge93.inet.ntl.com [80.5.162.133]
4 108 ms 143 ms 124 ms bagu-t2core-b-ge-wan63.inet.ntl.com [80.5.161.13
7]
5 177 ms 175 ms 171 ms lee-bb-b-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.29]
6 129 ms 114 ms 143 ms ren-bb-a-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.161]

7 47 ms 31 ms 67 ms bre-bb-b-so-200-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.166]

8 27 ms 25 ms 27 ms bre-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.86]
9 69 ms 71 ms 87 ms redb-ic-1-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.106]

10 178 ms 180 ms 213 ms xpe.999.gi0-3.rt0.thdo.catalyst2.com [217.79.160
.108]
11 182 ms 159 ms 127 ms 213.230.200.165

My m8 in our UT clan laughed when he saw this. Someone immediately said [9:43pm]«@ KI» its prolly your ubr m8
[9:43pm]«@ KI» oversubscribed :/

Hes on NTL in Scotland and had no probs on the same server.
All the dutch guys blamed me for lagging them on a UK server

[9:47pm]«@ KI» 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms gateway.mshome.net [192.168.0.1]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 2 8 ms 11 ms 6 ms 10.110.96.1
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 3 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms oldh-t2cam1-b-ge-wan42-113.inet.ntl.com [80.5.16
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 4.181]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 4 12 ms 8 ms 9 ms mant-t2core-b-ge-wan81.inet.ntl.com [213.104.242
[9:47pm]«@ KI» .201]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 5 8 ms 16 ms 9 ms man-bb-b-so-210-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.61]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 6 14 ms 14 ms 20 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.138]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 7 64 ms 17 ms 28 ms bre-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.234]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 8 18 ms 27 ms 17 ms bre-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.86]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 9 17 ms 18 ms 17 ms redb-ic-1-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.106]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 10 18 ms 17 ms 18 ms xpe.999.gi0-3.rt0.thdo.catalyst2.com [217.79.160
[9:47pm]«@ KI» .108]
[9:47pm]«@ KI» 11 18 ms 17 ms 29 ms 213.230.200.165

Those are his, and he goes through Manchester where i live!!!!
Is there anything that can be done?
Or am i stuck with this crappy connection.
Oh yeh its 1.5 meg Sacm.
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 22:07   #2
cf.mega poster
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,166
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Server trace

Quote:
Hes on NTL in Scotland and had no probs on the same server.
That second trace is from someone in the Oldham area - specifically on a UBR in Burnley (10.110.96.1). Hence it's not totally surprising that it's going through Manchester. I suggest he get a new A-Z!

The UBR isn't oversubscribed, either, this is peak time and nothing's even touching 50% of capacity.

The big increase in ping times between hops 3 and 4 is slightly worrying though, although my ping times in the reverse direction are all of 16ms to your UBR from here, which is fine. What does a ping directly to hops 3 and 4 give you?
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 22:24   #3
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
Re: Server trace

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms 10.10.112.1
3 24 ms 8 ms 6 ms bagu-t2cam1-b-ge93.inet.ntl.com [80.5.162.133]
is trace 3

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.10.112.1
3 6 ms 8 ms 10 ms bagu-t2cam1-b-ge93.inet.ntl.com [80
4 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms bagu-t2core-b-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com
3]
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 * * * Request timed out.
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 * * * Request timed out.

is trace 4.

Yeh soz hes Scottish, but lives locally, my mistake not his.
Thanks for the quick reply, i dont expect perfection, but playable would help a lot.
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 22:41   #4
cf.mega poster
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,166
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Server trace

Any chance of 100 or so pings to each of 80.5.162.133 and 80.5.161.137?
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 08:01   #5
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
Re: Server trace

Errr not sure how i go about that one?
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 08:30   #6
is lurking
 
Jon M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bracknell
Age: 30
Services: Freeview, NTL phone, NTL 4mbit BB SACM
Posts: 3,281
Jon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze array
Jon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze array
Send a message via MSN to Jon M
Re: Server trace

just use "ping -t ipaddress" it will continue until you hit CTRL+C

*after hitting CTRL+C you'll get the overall statistics of the completed pings
__________________
Forum Etiquette | Anti-Spam
'slightly pious, very sanctimonious and far too serious'
information is not a property of matter, it's applied to matter by intelligence

Last edited by s1lv3r; 06-10-2004 at 08:32.
Jon M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 08:42   #7
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
Re: Server trace

Cheers for that, not something i do a lot of, as you know in most online gaming, you can test ping on the server.
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 08:55   #8
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
Re: Server trace

Pinging 80.5.162.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 80.5.162.133: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253

Ping statistics for 80.5.162.133:
Packets: Sent = 103, Received = 103, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 40ms, Average = 7ms

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\GORDON>ping -t 80.5.162.133

Pinging 80.5.161.137 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=252
Reply from 80.5.161.137: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=252

Ping statistics for 80.5.161.137:
Packets: Sent = 65, Received = 65, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 158ms, Average = 11ms

Not quite a 100, is that enough i hope?
Cheers.
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 09:39   #9
cf.mega poster
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,166
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Server trace

Average of 7ms 2nd hop (on ntl's network) and 11ms on 3rd hop is absolutely excellent - there's no UBR congestion, but of course you didn't do it at peak times. Is the problem more manifest at peak times?
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 09:45   #10
the terminator
 
altis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 3,600
altis has a nice shiny star
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
Re: Server trace

I have to say that, from time to time, I have noticed probs that appear to start at bagu-t2core too. When I manage to capture a tracert (or ping) showing this then I'll post it.
altis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 10:33   #11
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
Re: Server trace

Quote:
Originally Posted by altis
I have to say that, from time to time, I have noticed probs that appear to start at bagu-t2core too. When I manage to capture a tracert (or ping) showing this then I'll post it.

I hope you can find it m8 i really do,and no sorry, they were done asap this morning, i will try and do the same at about 7-9pm, thats usually my main online gaming time.
I do get funny spikes at other times, ive used one of those bandwidth monitor tools, and all of a sudden its like it cuts off,then recovers, but does,nt totally destroy the connection if that makes any sense at all.
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 18:49   #12
Invalid E-Mail (Account Suspended)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
scoper is an unknown quantity at this point
Ping problems in Manchester

Have tried playing counter strike over the last few days to find my ping has dropped badly.
Did a traceroute and got the following:

Tracing route to www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 19 ms 35 ms 104 ms 10.17.80.1
2 72 ms 177 ms 46 ms bagu-t2cam1-a-ge-wan54-126.inet.ntl.com [80.5.162.105]
3 31 ms 95 ms 77 ms bagu-t2core-a-ge-wan61.inet.ntl.com [80.5.161.5]
4 59 ms 19 ms * man-bb-a-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.25]
5 43 ms 34 ms 38 ms man-bb-b-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.178]
6 30 ms 133 ms 215 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.138]
7 41 ms 67 ms 16 ms win-dc-a-v900.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.162]
8 92 ms 15 ms 14 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]
Trace complete.

These pings seem really bad to me. Anyone able to help?
Using a cable modem on 750k btw
Cheers
scoper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 19:10   #13
Cable ceased I gone
 
Florence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: The wonders of Sky TV BT line and Aquiss.net ADSL cable dies on 5th RIP VM.
Posts: 3,971
Florence has disabled reputation
Re: Ping problems in Manchester

I am in Manchester Where abouts are you I am Droylsden and I have just done this tracert.

Quote:
Tracing route to www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.0.1
2 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10.11.32.1
3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms oldh-t2cam1-b-ge-wan51-120.inet.ntl.com [80.5.16
4.209]
4 10 ms 110 ms 10 ms mant-t2core-b-ge-wan64.inet.ntl.com [213.104.242
.181]
5 <10 ms 10 ms 10 ms man-bb-b-so-130-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.22]

6 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.138]

7 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms win-dc-a-v900.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.162]
8 10 ms 21 ms 10 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30]

Trace complete.
__________________
I'm enjoying Aquiss. Are you? Now happily surfing the internet phorm phree long may my surfing be phree of spyware.
nice one Good luck all.no need to hang around no longer cable customer
Florence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 19:13   #14
Invalid E-Mail (Account Suspended)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
scoper is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Ping problems in Manchester

I'm in Withington, South Manchester
scoper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 19:35   #15
Registered Abuser
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester South
Services: BB XL
Posts: 658
Rone has disabled reputation
Re: Ping problems in Manchester

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...ad.php?t=18421

Check it out.
Rone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35.


Links
Google
 
Web www.cableforum.co.uk


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Cable Forum.
(s204569790.onlinehome.info)