Virgin Media in talks over bringing back Sky - Page 6

TheBlueRaja · 11-05-2008, 18:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by frogstamper

This is a pointless argument, whether you have Sky TV or VM-TV everyone [nearly] has a choice as to what they want, if you don't like one or the other switch providers, as someone said earlier we are not in the playground boasting as to who has the most channels or content, I'm sure both have their positives and negatives.

HE started it

the-cable-guy · 11-05-2008, 18:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

HE started it

pmpl

---------- Post added at 18:29 ---------- Previous post was at 18:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

My word pull your pants up and stop trying to see how far higher you can urinate up the wall. I'm not interested in a 'mines better than yours' argument, quite frankly that's playground stuff. Are you sure 32 is your real age?

Well done - thanks for highlighting how immature you can get.

you go gal lol

**Mick** · 11-05-2008, 20:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

I never made a claim that Freeview has more channels.

You certainly well did - You stated I qualified for Freeview. Thus one can only interpret that as you meaning Virgin Media has less than or equal channel amount to Freeview.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

You must be making assumptions again.

Are you having a memory lapse? - Forgetting what you are saying now? It's there in black and white.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

You seem to be saying that you dont like to watch anything with the word Sky in the channel name. As the owner of cableforum, i wouldn't expect you to be unbiased but to write down the name of every Sky channel and explain why you dont like it is a bit OTT dont you think?

As if you never go over the top with your loving relationship with your beloved Sky.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

It *could* be construed you were taking bungs carrying on like that.

It really would suit your anti-VM agenda wouldn't it if I really was. But I ain't so sorry to upset you on that one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

You seem to be very happy paying the same subscription price for a reduced number of channels as well, most bizarre.

Again - it was 4 channels - It was no loss - I never watched them when I had them so I am hardly going to miss them when they are gone.

I am actually paying less than I was a year ago and I now have a V+ box as well. You see updating the bundle offers that new customers get means I can save a packet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

As for not replying because i don't have any baseline to judge (as the original opinion provided by the original poster did not have any link or figures to back up his claim), your damn right i didn't respond. See, i don't make claims my butt cant cash.

I'll tell you why you didn't respond, you didn't respond because you were replying selectively. It's a complete cop out that you didn't reply when you claimed you had no baseline to make any kind judgement. You had no baseline to come out and say I qualified for Freeview, you made that statement! So you do reply when it suits your agenda.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

You should take that on board Mick, sometimes your friends aren't the most reliable of sources.

I have absolutely no idea on Earth what you are referring to or going on about.

TheBlueRaja · 11-05-2008, 21:15

Im just not going to bother Mick, its not worth the wear on my keyboard.

Sirius · 11-05-2008, 22:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

Im just not going to bother Mick, its not worth the wear on my keyboard.

Thank you, Does that mean you will shut up now ?.

TheBlueRaja · 11-05-2008, 22:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius

Thank you, Does that mean you will shut up now ?.

Hell no, i'll just move on to humiliating you now.

**Stuart C** · 11-05-2008, 22:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

No, i am biased actually. Sky is better than Virgin IMO and i couldn't give a

if you don't want to hear that.

Yet, despite that, you *do* keep reminding us.

Sirius · 11-05-2008, 22:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

Hell no, i'll just move on to humiliating you now.

what ever. Just keep it clean.

**Stuart C** · 11-05-2008, 22:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

Im not surprised the viewing figures are low, you don't have Sky.

Yep, the Barb figures for Sky one are rather embarassing..

Arthurgray50@blu · 11-05-2008, 22:42

I think l've worn my keyboard out on this business, but l think the final season of Sky v Vm is; VM 0, Sky I, l don't think anyone can beat Sky, they have so much to offer, than VM, BUT, the V+ box of VM is better quality than Sky+. and cheaper.

NO ONE · 11-05-2008, 22:51

p s compeard to Sky and Vm Freervew is lot o tosh now anway

the-cable-guy · 12-05-2008, 00:06

Freeview has always been pants.

Fergie Boy · 12-05-2008, 00:22

but the new freesat is going to be mega. We should alll rush out and get the box and dish

the-cable-guy · 12-05-2008, 00:24

? why is it ? you get less channels with freesat then if you buy a Sky receiver & mini dish (or any FTA receiver) for less money & they use the same satellites.

**Mick** · 12-05-2008, 00:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

Im just not going to bother Mick, its not worth the wear on my keyboard.

Ask me if I am bothered, does my face look bothered? Am I even bothered? No. The bottom line is that you cannot accept the fact that I rip your arguments to shreds, because you have such a flawed approach to every debate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

Hell no, i'll just move on to humiliating you now.

You didn't humiliate me because I don't feel humiliated, so how you can humiliate someone else, I'll never know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C

Yep, the Barb figures for Sky one are rather embarassing..

Stu - can you post a link to this fact. Thanks.