View Single Post
Old 23-12-2003, 01:14   #10
Paul M
Busy Admin
 
Paul M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 47
Services: VM Phone : Sky+ Multiroom : VM Cable (20 Mbps)
Posts: 16,200
Paul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny stars
Paul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny starsPaul M has a pair of shiny stars
Re: NTL's Poxy Proxies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikko
Surely the choice, then, already exists?
No, there is no choice atm - anything I send to port 80 is routed to a Nottingham cache, there is nothing I can do about it unless NTL remove this automatic routing - then I would have a choice.

I believe that some areas within the NTL network do have this choice - their port 80 traffic is not automatically intercepted by a cache. Nottingham is not one of them.

Please do not get bogged down by who happened to start it - it's not really that relevant (I hadn't even noticed until it was pointed out) - lets be brutally honest here, NTL are unlikely to change anything based on an online petition - but at least it might wake them up slightly.
__________________
DigiGuide : Twitter : Facebook : CF Twitter : CF Facebook
I want your loving and I want your revenge. You and me could write a bad romance.
Paul M is offline   Reply With Quote